Tuesday, January 31, 2023

Two Awful Yet Similar Nights Thirty Plus Years Apart

Last night, I experienced something that was not entirely new, exactly. There had been one evening that was, in some cases, eerily similar to it. But the thing was, I had been little more than a kid that last time, and had felt overwhelmed by everything going on in my life then. 

What happened?

Well, I was driving a car that overheated. And both times, it happened right in the middle of a drive that normally would have taken less than an hour. Maybe it would normally take just under an hour both back in 1992, and usually under an hour now, in 2023. 

On each of those two nights, more than 30 years apart, the drive wound up taking well over four hours, requiring me to continually stop and allow the car to cool off enough for the drive to continue. 

Of course, there are differences between the two nights. In the first one, I was actually probably more prepared for the overheating, since I had been a bit used to it with that car, an Eagle Medallion, which had a history of overheating. This time, I was also driving a car with a history of overheating. It is a 2012 Toyota Corolla, and throughout most of last year, the temperature gauge quite frequently showed wild fluctuations with the temperature gauge. That's the thing, though: it had not actually, really overheated, so much as just seemed to do so, according to the needle on the temperature gauge. 

Unfortunately, it was not just the needle of the temperature gauge this time around last night. I had assumed at first - wrongly, as it turns out - that it probably was this same old problem. It was still aggravating, since I literally spent thousands of dollars on fixing that same problem. But the temperature gauge did not keep wavering back and forth. Instead, it pretty much kept climbing up and up, higher and higher and closer to the Red H on top, indicating emergency hot temperatures. Much like what happened over 30 years ago, on a fairly similar night.

There were differences between the two nights, of course. The first time, I was just a dumb kid, one who was, I can admit it now, going through depression. That event certainly did not help. But I was nervous and felt overwhelmed by the situation which I found myself in. I got some help once or twice, but rarely felt as alone as I felt on that night. When I got home, my father was waiting, and he was in his best yelling mode, angry and unable to contain it, which was a real problem back then. Needless to say, that did not help me feel any better about what had happened. 

It is strange what happens with memories over time. That night - it was probably sometimes in October of 1992 - seemed to last almost forever in some ways. I drove past farms in the daylight portion of the drive, and also past just tons of political posters, including Clinton/Gore. At that point, I had grown up under 12 years of Republican rule in the White House, and could not remember it ever having been different. But Clinton was winning the election, and it was late. Most people seemed to think that he more or less had the race in the bag. I was cautiously optimistic, but a part of me was almost sure that somehow, this would get screwed up just before election night, and that Bush would win another term. Naively, I hoped that if Clinton did get in, things would change for the better. I look at that younger version of myself, and it feels like he was an entirely different person at times. Sometimes, it feels like he is still very close, and those times not so long ago. Other times, all of that feels very far away, almost completely irrelevant. 

Now, I was going through it at a much older age, and under vast different circumstances. Back then, I was coming from Sussex County to Passaic County, or West Milford, specifically. This time, it was from Butler, New Jersey (where my ex and our son live) to Hillsborough, New Jersey. Long drives in both cases, admittedly. And like in 1992, I rejoiced a little more internally each time there were real indications that I was nearing home. 

This time, instead of an angry father - who only recently passed away last spring - waiting for me, I had a concerned girlfriend who heated up some food and coffee for me, and told me to relax, softly reminding me that the ordeal was now over, and I was indeed home. Very different reception. 

Again, different circumstances. Very different. Back in the autumn of 1992, I was still a teenage kid, just months removed from high school, and had nothing in the way of a job or girlfriend or anything, much less a son. There was much more going for me in my life than I realized, but being in the bubble of a depression, I was not seeing it. And if there was one night that might have symbolized - at least in my own head - just how bad and desperate I felt at the time, that was it.

Things are very different now. One major difference was that this time, I kept remembering that first night and rather struck by the similarities. Yet, I did so with a very different frame of mind, my focal point continually returning to being grateful for my life's blessings. I thought of both my son and my girlfriend, and how they each were on different ends of this particular trip. Both of them are relatively healthy and happy, and both add some strong value to my life. The rest of my family also has decent health, as do I, for the most part. Also, I work two jobs and am relatively stable financially, despite the seemingly recurring uncertainties revolving around issues with cars. So yeah, these days, if there is one thing that I have learned, it is to at least try and remember to feel grateful for the blessings in life. That certainly helps to keep one humble, I think.

It almost feels like a tale of two nights, Very similar in many respects. Yet also different. Very different.

Still, both were defined by feeling long and frustrating and cold, no doubt. Back in October of 1992, I remember that it felt chilly. Yesterday, it certainly could have been colder than it was, given the fact that it is late January in New Jersey. Yet, by continually going outside and standing over the hood, then returning to a car turned off and unheated, I began to feel quite cold. Even when I drove and was cranking the hot air - generally something that you are supposed to do when a car overheats - all that was blowing in was cold air, which of course, might have been part of the problem. And admittedly, the ordeal of last night felt a little too reminiscent of that awful night, some thirty years and change ago. 

30 Years Ago Today: Cowboys Blow Out Bills in Super Bowl XXVII

  


Dallas Cowboys 


SUPER BOWL XXVII CHAMPIONS








🏈🏈🏈🏈

 





Yes, today is the quarter century anniversary of the first of two consecutive Super Bowl meetings between the Dallas Cowboys and the Buffalo Bills. Dallas was a young and rising team on the verge of greatness, while Buffalo managed to equal the feat of the Miami Dolphins of the early 1970's by tying their record of three straight Super Bowl appearances. The next year, they would break that record and make it a fourth straight time, which still stands as a record. 

The game itself ended up being quite lopsided in favor of Dallas, as they won the first of three championships in a four year span, which would qualify them for "Team of the Decade" honors for the nineties.

Here is a recap of that Super Bowl, which took place 30 years ago on this day:


Super Bowl XXVII Dallas Cowboys 52, Buffalo Bills 17. Emmitt Smith, Troy Aikman, Michael Irvin and Alvin Harper. Rose Bowl Stadium, MVP Troy Aikman, Favorite Cowboys by 6.5, National anthem Garth Brooks, Coin toss O.J. Simpson, Halftime show Michael Jackson, Attendance 98,374. Network NBC, Announcers Dick Enberg and Bob Trumpy, Nielsen ratings 45.1, est. 90.99 million viewers, Market share 66, Cost of 30-second commercial US$ 850,000


Personal Memories: I had just begun going to school again, this time at an institution of higher education at Bergen Community College. Still very young, and really almost still a high school student, it felt kind of good to be the youngest, or near the youngest, bloke around. I joined the Environmental Club, and was starting to enrich my social life quite a bit. Things were really looking up for me at that point, and I recall that spring semester very fondly, perhaps even as one of the most pleasant times of my life.


This was a cool Super Bowl, with a bit of history. The Dallas Cowboys had been one of the teams that had always seemed to make the Super Bowl before I was a fan, but just like the Pittsburgh Steelers, I had just missed all of that with the first season of being a fan of the NFL in 1981. So, to see them in the Super Bowl, and to see the immediate reaction of so many people, was something to see. Also, I was very pleased that they beat the hated San Francisco 49ers when those two franchises renewed their rivalry. On the AFC side, it was awesome to watch the Buffalo Bills overcome a deficit of 32 points to mount the greatest comeback in NFL history to date, and then to qualify for a record tying third straight Super Bowl. That said, I felt bad for the Bills when they completely fell apart, particularly in the final quarter, when they went from down 31-17, with some slim hopes of still winning it, to a humiliating 52-17 route that, ironically, could actually have been worse, had Leon Lett not infamously celebrated before actually scoring what should have been an easy touchdown.




Here are some of the major events that took place in 1993, the year this Super Bowl was played. The world's population was 5.522 billion people. The Maastrict Treaty effectively created the European Union. Vaclav Havel was elected President of the Czech Republic. South Africa adopted a constitution that gave the majority the rule over the country. An Israeli-Palestinian Accord was reached. The British House of Commons passed the European Unity pact. In Somalia, 22 United Nations troops were killed. China broke the nuclear weapons test moratorium. Russian President Boris Yeltsin crushed a revolt in the Russian Parliament. Just days before Super Bowl XXVII, Bill Clinton took the oath of office to become the 42nd President of the United States.



http://boards.sportslogos.net/topic/98529-super-bowl-field-database-sb-xlvi-texture-added-122215/page-9

Monday, January 30, 2023

🏈🏈 NFL 2022-23 Playoffs NFC & AFC Championship Games Review: Both Number One Seeds Advance to Super Bowl 🏈🏈

                



🏈🏈🏈🏈

 




Well, here we go. Championship Game weekend, with three of the four exact same teams that we saw play at this point last season. In fact, the AFC Championship is a rematch of last year's AFC title game, and will be played in the same venue. As for the NFC, the 49ers will be making their third appearance in four years in the NFC title game, while the Eagles were one of the preseason favorites, and enjoyed a dream season.

So it's all the truly quality teams who reached this point. And the thing is, there is not a mismatch here, at least looking at the teams as they get ready for these games. I could see any of these teams playing extremely well and winning, which is simply not the case in many seasons. Sometimes, you just feel like there is a team that is so clearly superior to their opponents, that you just figure that they will win, and perhaps easily. Then again, I had assumed that of Kansas City last season, and look what happened in that one.

It truly feels like any of these four teams could get hot and win the whole thing, and bring the Lombardi Trophy home with them. But only two of these teams will advance to the Super Bowl this weekend, while the other two will not have survived, and will face the unwelcome prospect of an off-season filled with questions. High stakes indeed.

Let's take a look at the games to be played this weekend:






    

NFC Championship Game







San Francisco 49ers 



at



Philadelphia Eagles



      


Guess it's safe to say that I underestimated the Eagles, when I picked the 49ers to win. Traditionally, the team that is best on defense does well come playoff time, and the 49ers had seemed to me to be red hot. The Eagles still had some question marks, or appeared to me to have some uncertainties, in any case. Jalen Hurts even admitted that he was not one hundred percent. And it as just a few weeks ago that they appeared to be struggling, even stumbling to the finish line.

Also, I thought that the 49ers looked potentially explosive on offense. This was a team with incredible talent in their running game. And Brock Purdy had been filling in admirably at the quarterback position. Plus, he had George Kittle and Christian McCaffrey, among others. So I had assumed - wrongly, obviously - that San Fran would give the Eagles all that they could handle. In fact, my assumption was that they would give Philly more than they could handle, given the incredible talent, experience, and coaching that the 49ers franchise is currently blessed with.

None of that was in evidence in yesterday's game, however. If Hurts looked less than one hundred percent, than seeing what he is capable of when he is at one hundred percent is  terrifying thought. Indeed, Philadelphia dominated in every way that they wanted to. They held onto the ball for well over 37 minutes, produced 25 first downs while limiting San Francisco to just 11 first downs, and produced 269 total yards while allowing just 164 for the Niners. Plus, the Eagles committed no turnovers, while the 49ers committed three. 

All of that led, not surprisingly, to the kind of lopsided game that we got. Philadelphia dominated most of this game, although they really assumed full control for good late in the second quarter. Prior to that, the 49ers looked like they were keeping up, as the game was even after San Francisco had scored a touchdown to tie it midway through the second quarter. But the Eagles capped a 13-play drive that took 6:53 off the clock with a 13-yard touchdown by Miles Sanders for a 14-7 lead. Shortly after that, they capitalized from a bizarre San Francisco turnover with a drive of just three plays which culminated in a 10-yard touchdown run by Boston Scott. It might not have been ball game over by that point, but certainly, Philly had San Fran on the ropes. 

To get back into the game, the 49ers would have needed a strong passing game. The problem was that their quarterbacks kept getting knocked out of the game. Brock Purdy was injured in the first half, and although he would come back to play later in the game, he simply handed off, clearly uncomfortable with passing. He had been impressive on the day, completing 4 of 4 passes for 23 yards. The man who replaced him, Josh Johnson, completed 7 of 13 passes for 74 yards. The running game did not save them, either. Christian McCaffrey led all Niners running with 84 yards and a touchdown on 15 carries. Deebo Samuel led 49ers receivers with 33 yards on three catches.

None of it was enough to even come close for the 49ers. They were not able to get back into the game in the second half, crippled as they were in their passing game. And the Eagles kept wearing down that top-rated defense, sustaining a 15-play, 91 yard drive that ate up almost eight minutes of the clock in the third quarter, and culminated with a one-yard touchdown run by Hurts. 

As Warner Wolf used to say, you could turn you television sets off by that point. 

Hurts completed 15 of 25 passes for 121 yards. He also ran 11 times for an additional 39 yards, including a touchdown. Still, he did clearly look less than one hundred percent, although he nevertheless obviously helped his team to victory in this one. Kenneth Gainwell added 48 yards on 14 carries, and Miles Sanders earned 42 yards and a touchdown on 11 carries. Finally, Boston Scott got 21 yards and a touchdown on 6 carries. So Philadelphia had a very solid level of production on a balanced running attack. 

DeVonta Smith led all Eagles receivers in terms of yards, earning 36 yards on just two catches. Dallas Geodert caught the most passes with five, but picked up only 23 yards. A.J. Brown had four catches for 28 yards. Again, not the most explosive day for Philly's offense. However, it was more than enough to help the Eagles score a decisive victory, earning the fourth Super Bowl berth in franchise history. 

Now, they will have to prepare for Patrick Mahomes and the Kansas City Chiefs, led by their former head coach Andy Reid, in Super Bowl LVII. Should be interesting. 


My pick: Inaccurate









AFC Championship Game







  Cincinnati Bengals


at 


Kansas City Chiefs




 


Unlike the NFC Championship Game, this one came down to the wire. Unfortunately, I believe that this one will be remembered for the frankly poor officiating that sure seemed to help lift the Chiefs over the Bengals at Arrowhead last night. 

There were a series of controversial calls that benefitted the hometown Chiefs. With less than ten minutes left in a tied game, the Bengals had apparently stopped the dangerous Chiefs offense cold, and were set to get the ball back. But the officials stepped in and called a frankly questionable call against the Bengals, which was followed by another questionable call on the very next play. The Chiefs saw their drive sustained, and the Bengals saw their defense stay on the field, and their own possible field position once they got the ball back worsen. Things like that so late in such a tight game might have really helped to decide the game.

Still, neither team was able to score and break the tie. But the Chiefs had the ball last, and Mahomes and the KC offense are always dangerous. They did manage to get more or less to midfield at the 43-yard line and had a chance at what would have been a very long field goal attempt, by no means a sure thing. But Bengals linebacker Joseph Ossai was called for a penalty after hitting Mahomes out of bounds, which pushed the Chiefs 15 yards closer. Suddenly, the Chiefs had the ball at the 28-yard line, and a field goal looked like a likely conversion. So that was a huge play. There was some controversy regarding the call, although I have to say that, to me, it did look like Ossai hit Mahomes out of bounds, and completely unnecessarily. Ossai slunk down to the bench afterwards, and seemed completely devastated after KC converted the field goal, which effectively iced the win for them. 

Fellow Bengals teammate Germaine Pratt also seemed highly critical of the hit on Mahomes by Ossai with eight seconds left in the game. Obviously, that helped the Chiefs cause immensely. He was caught on video yelling as an obviously disappointed Bengals team returned to their locker rock: 

“It’s the motherf–kin’ last series,” Pratt screamed out. “What the f–k. Why the f–k did you touch the quarterback?”

From my standpoint, I agree. You know that the refs are always going to be watching for any hit on a quarterback, especially if that quarterback is Mahomes. And to place a hit on him at such a key point late in the game, with literally seconds left, and the outcome riding on the play, and eventually, on the late hit call that gave the Chiefs an unearned 15 extra yards? Yes, there were some controversial calls against the Bengals, which may have indeed helped the Chiefs to win this one. But at that point, the Bengals were still tied up, and the game seemed to be heading towards overtime. The Bengals defense kept coming up big, and that field goal attempt would have been far more uncertain without the extra 15 yards that the Chiefs gained because of the penalty. I still think that Cincy had a chance, and a real chance, to win it. That play was, frankly, boneheaded, and very, very costly. 

In fact, I felt like the Bengals had more or less outplayed the Chiefs up to that point in the game. 

Still, it was a very tight game, and still could have gone either way. KC had a slight advantage in terms of time of possession, holding onto the ball for over 32 minutes. They earned 357 total yards and 23 first downs, to 309 yards and 18 first downs for Cincy. The Bengals committed two turnovers on the day, both from interceptions thrown by Burrow. 

On the day, Mahomes completed 29 of 43 for 326 yards and two touchdowns. Isiah Pacheco ran for 26 yards on 10 carries, although those statistics were a bit deceptive. In fact, Pacheco felt like he was very effective at key times, and was a real torn on the Bengals side, particularly late in the contest. He also picked up 59 yards with five catches. Marquez Valdes-Scantling earned 116 yards and a touchdown with six catches. Travis Kelce, predictably, was a force for the passing games, earning 78 yards and a touchdown on seven catches. 

Joe Burrow completed 26 of 41 246 with one touchdown and two INT's in what was ultimately a losing cause for Cincinnati. He also ran four times, picking up 30 yards, which led all Bengals runners. However, Samaje Perine had a decent day, picking up 22 yards and a touchdown on five carries. But the Bengals offense was mostly strongest with the passing attack. Tee Higgins was great 83 yards and a touchdown on six catches. Ja'Marr Chase also stood out with six catches for 75 yards. 

Still, the Chiefs now advance to the Super Bowl for the third time in the past four years. Andy Reid now ranks second on the list of most playoff wins by any head coach, and this counts as the fourth Super Bowl that he has reached in his head coaching career. The Chiefs beat the 49ers in Super Bowl LIV, but then got walloped by the Buccaneers the next year in Super Bowl LV. It should be interesting to see how they do, and how they will prepare, for Reid's former team, the Philadelphia Eagles. 


My pick: Accurate



Here are some links to articles that address some of the controversial calls against the Bengals from yesterday's AFC Championship Game:


The NFL’s ‘all-star’ officiating crews are ruining the playoffs by Ben Volin of The Boston Globe, January 30, 2023: 

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/01/30/sports/nfl-playoffs-officiating/




NFL World Furious With AFC Championship Game Referees by Andrew Holleran, January 29, 2023: 

https://thespun.com/nfl/nfl-world-furious-with-afc-championship-game-referees



Germaine Pratt screams over Joseph Ossai’s late hit that ended Bengals season: ‘Why the f–k’ By Justin Terranova January 30, 2023

https://nypost.com/2023/01/30/germaine-pratt-screams-over-joseph-assais-late-hit-that-cost-bengals/



The NFL’s ‘all-star’ officiating crews are ruining the playoffs by Ben Volin of The Boston Globe, January 30, 2023: 

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/01/30/sports/nfl-playoffs-officiating/

The Beatles Rooftop Show Anniversary

  


Photo by Luiz Fernando Reis (Bealtes cor 36 on Flickr) 
Creative Commons License -https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

beatles



It was on this day in 1969 that the Beatles made their last ever public appearance together as a band.

The funny thing about what became such a historical, iconic moment in the history of a band that set so many of the standards of what was still then the relatively new rock genre, and which many people still consider to be the greatest rock band in history, is that it seemed like no particularly big deal at the time for a few people who happened to be there. That is true of Ken Mansfield, the former American manager for Apple Records, who recalled in a recent Rolling Stone article:

“It was another day at the office,” Ken Mansfield says, recalling the Beatles’ impromptu rooftop concert in January 1969. There’s not even a hint of sarcasm in his voice. The group staged the gig atop Apple Records’ London office at 3 Savile Row, 50 years ago today, with the intention of shooting the ending for what would become their Let It Be film. It was an item on a checklist. Mansfield, who was born in Idaho, was the label’s U.S. manager at the time. “Some of the people in the Apple office didn’t even try to come up, because it was just another day.” 

Just another day at the office, indeed! As it turns out, Mansfield would actually write a book, with the simple yet revealing title, "The Roof," about that particular day, which some had dismissed as "just another day at the office." 

The story continues:

Mansfield was invited to watch the historic performance, the Beatles’ last live gig, at the urging of the band’s roadie, Mal Evans. “I think Mal just liked to take care of me, so he made sure I was up there,” he says. When he found out about the afternoon gig, Mansfield ran out and bought a white raincoat, since it was in the low 40s outside, and huddled on a bench with Yoko Ono, Ringo’s then-wife Maureen Starkey and Apple staffer Chris O’Dell to watch the quartet perform nine songs, including multiple retakes of “Get Back.” “George had me light some cigarettes for him for a few minutes just so he could hold the tips of his fingers up against the coals so he could feel his strings,” Mansfield recalls. “And I know John was really complaining about it, about the cold and how he couldn’t feel his hands.” 

“I just happened to be working in the offices that week,” he says. “And Mal just happened to say,
‘Hey, come on, Ken, we’re going up in 15 minutes.’ I said, ‘What do you mean?’ He said, ‘We’re going on the roof, and so come on.'” The rest, he says, is history."

And so, a kind of spur of the moment thing became one of the most famous episodes in the history of one of the most storied bands in music history! This was when John Lennon made that now legendary comment about hoping to pass the audition.

It all happened exactly 54 years ago, on this day, that the Beatles performed as a band in public for one final time.

Below is a kind of disjointed video that, nevertheless, purports to be able to show you the entire concert, from beginning to end. Enjoy!







Below are links to the articles that I used in writing this particular blog entry, particularly the Rolling Stone article:

The Beatles’ Final Concert: An Eyewitness Looks Back Ken Mansfield, former U.S. manager for Apple Records, recalls watching the momentous 1969 rooftop performance mere feet from the Fab Four  By KORY GROW, January 30, 2019:






By JIM AXELROD CBS NEWS January 30, 2019, 6:56 PM The Beatles' historic final concert held on rooftop 50 years ago


Sunday, January 29, 2023

Novak Djokovic Tops Stefanos Tsitsipas in Straight Set To Win 10th Australian Open & 22nd Career Grand Slam Championship

     IMG_0357


It is official now. Novak Djokovic has won another Australian Open, besting Greek Stefanos Tsitsipas in straight sets, 6-3, 7-6, 7-6. 

Djokovic has now won his 10th career Australian Open title, by far more than anyone else in history at that particular tournament, man or woman. Only Rafael Nadal, Djokovic's main rival, has ever shown superior dominance at a Grand Slam event, that being the French Open, which he has won 14 times. The two men stand alone not only in their utter and complete dominance at these particular tournaments, but also in being undefeated once they reach the Final for these tournaments. Nadal is 14-0 when he reaches the French Open Men's Final, while Djokovic is now 10-0 when he reaches the Australian Open Men's Final.

This also marks Djokovic's 22nd Grand Slam championship, tying the record for most Grand Slams won by a man which had been held by Nadal. Now, the two rivals are tied atop that all-time list once again. The next Grand Slam event is the French Open, where Nadal is the obvious candidate to win. His historical dominance on clay courts, and particularly at Roland-Garros, is now already almost stuff of legend. You have to figure that he has a decent chance to earn a 23rd career Grand Slam, and a 15th French Open title, at that point. However, Djokovic is one of only two men to have defeated Nadal at the French Open, and he also stands as the only player in history to have beaten Nadal twice there. Plus, Djokovic is generally regarded as more consistent on the other surfaces, and with Wimbledon and the US Open following, it seems like both men will have the opportunity to add to their already impressive trophy collections.

Together with the recently retired Roger Federer, the "Big 3" have dominated the men's game in tennis dating back to early 2004, when Federer won his second Grand Slam title by capturing the Australian Open, and then reaching number one for the first time. Since then, with very few exceptions, it has either been Federer, Nadal, or Djokovic sitting stop the number one ranking, and collecting far and away the most major trophies, particularly Grand Slam titles.

In short, this has been an incredible time to watch brilliance, incredible talent, and very strong work ethic by these three men. It still continues, even if Federer now is no longer in the picture.

On one small note, I will say that I am glad that Djokovic won today against Tsitsipas. Why? Because I believe that Tsitsipas is, frankly, a bit of a brat, and possibly a xenophobe in certain regards. 

Now, why would I say that? Well, in a 2019 US Open match, the referee warned Tsitsipas against delaying the game while Tsitsipas was evidently craping up. Tsitipas fired back:

“For some reason, you have something against me,” Tsitsipas said to Dumusois. “I don’t know what ― because you’re French probably. And you’re all weirdos. You’re all weirdos.”

Asshole.

Nor was that the only time that Tsitsipas showed such ridiculous and inexcusable behavior. Tsitsipas has a rather extensive history of ridiculous, unsportsmanlike, and frankly inexcusable behavior, to the point where it is well-known among anyone who is familiar with tennis. He has a tendency to take long bathroom breaks and to resort to body shots when he gets into trouble against an opponent. The ATP actually modified it's rules on bathroom breaks after Tsitsipas took such a long bathroom break when he got into serious trouble in a match against Andy Murray. In November - just a couple of months ago - Tsitsipas hit a ball in the direction of the players box in a match against Andrey Rublev, which he eventually lost. Also, he once called Daniil Medvedev a "bulls*** Russian." Again, obnoxious and close-minded, frankly spoiled behavior by Tsitipas. Whenever an idiot like Tsitipas labels "all" of one particular group for being something unflattering, or insults somebody's nationality - which he has done more than once, and in very publish fashion, at that - you are not dealing with a genius, or a thoughtful person. Tsitipas seemed to me to be a spoiled brat, whining because he was not getting his way. A classless and clueless dumb jock, who makes it hard, if not impossible, for thoughtful people to root for him.

Let's face it: Tsitsipas seems to typify the dumb jock mentality. Clearly, he is very talented on the court, and can and has done some amazing things. For that, he obviously works hard at conditioning, keeping himself fit. Too bad that he does not seem to exercise that most important muscle in his head as much as he works on the ones in the rest of his body. What makes it worse is that he comes from a privileged background, and plays in a sport sometimes itself regarded as elitist. 

So yeah, on that note, I am glad that Tsitipas lost this one. I do not usually rejoice in someone's losses like this, except when there is a good reason for it. And with Tsitsipas, I think there is an abundance of reasons to rejoice in his losses. Frankly, it is unfortunate and completely unnecessary. I actually would normally pull for someone from a relatively small country that does not get much attention in the sports world, such as Greece. It is sad to me that Tsitsipas makes it so damn difficult to root for him.










U.S. Open Loser Insults Umpire For Being French: 'You're All Weirdos.' by  Ron Dicker Aug 28, 2019:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/stefanos-tsitsipas-french-weirdos-us-open_n_5d66693be4b022fbceb3dd11




Does Stefanos Tsitsipas fly under the radar when it comes to the worst sportsmanship on the men’s tour? by Myre Aberdan6 months ago

https://lobandsmash.com/2022/07/02/stefanos-tsitsipas-fly-radar-comes-worst-sportsmanship-mens-tour/




Tsitsipas: A pattern of gamesmanship and bad behavior  Thread starterjm1980  Start dateSep 29, 2020

https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/tsitsipas-a-pattern-of-gamesmanship-and-bad-behavior.680421/




Stefanos Tsitsipas shows ugly side again in loss to Andrey Rublev published by James Richardson in Tennis365, November 19, 2022:

https://www.tennis365.com/atp-tour/stefanos-tsitsipas-shows-ugly-side-loss-andrey-rublev/

The Most Devastating Playoff Loss For Each Franchise




These lists are often rather ridiculous. Often, they are written or organized by someone who's memory does not stretch past six weeks or so, and so they have an obvious, and perhaps somewhat understandable, bias towards very recent history.

This one was different. They did get the most brutal and devastating postseason losses for each franchise right, with perhaps two exceptions. One in particular seems so obviously to have been missed, that it makes me feel like it tarnishes the entire list.

First, let me start with the one that I am uncertain about. That would be for the Houston Oilers/Tennessee Titans. The loss that they list is Super Bowl XXXIV, when the Titans stormed back from a 16-0 deficit to tie the game. But the Rams scored a touchdown very late, and Tennessee had a quick drive that took them within striking distance of the tying touchdown. On the game's final play, the Titans were obviously looking for a touchdown to tie the game and force overtime, and fell one yard shy. Brutal.

But as brutal as seven seasons earlier, when the then Houston Oilers, a team loaded with talent on both offense and defense, raced out to a 28-3 halftime lead against the Bills in Buffalo, then added a defensive touchdown early in the third quarter to expand it to 35-3, only to collapse and lose? At the time, it was the greatest comeback in NFL history, as no team had overcome a 32-point deficit and come back to win the game before. It easily stood alone. Now earlier this season, the Vikings actually overcame a 33-0 deficit against the Colts to win. But that was a regular season game. The Bills-Oilers game was a playoff game, an elimination game, and it also happened before the two-point conversion, which means that the 32-point comeback by Buffalo felt more impressive in many respects than did the Vikings comeback this season.

Here's the thing: the owner of the Oilers - a team which had historically underachieved in recent seasons leading up to that playoff collapse, gave the the team an ultimatum. Either they get to the Super Bowl, and win, the next season, or he would completely disband the team (and remember, they were very, very talented). When the team failed to produce a championship - indeed, failed to produce even a postseason victory - Bud Adams, the owner, held true to his word, and dismantled that team. He also opted out of town, trying to put the bad taste of the Houston Oilers franchise to the past, with a fresh start in Tennessee. So I think a legitimate argument could be made that the historical Wildcard comeback, which the Oilers were on the wrong end of, was the most brutal playoff loss. It literally led to the end of the Houston Oilers as an NFL franchise altogether.

Yet, the one that to me was obvious, a no-brainer, was not that. After all, the Titans could have finally won a Super Bowl, and were prevented from forcing overtime (or possibly going for two to win it?) by that one, single yard. So maybe that was more devastating. That is arguable.

On the other hand, the most devastating loss listed for the Colts was for the 2005-06 loss. The Colts went 14-2 that season, but lost to the Steelers in a strange manner in the divisional round. True, there were some plays that were costly and brutal to watch, perhaps particularly that screwed up field goal attempt by Mike Vanderjagt. Yes, devastating.

More devastating than the loss by the Colts to Joe Namath and the Jets in Super Bowl III, which still stands as the greatest upset in NFL history, and one of the biggest and most famous upsets in North American sport history? I don't think so. Listen, I was not even born, yet that game was part of the lore, even the mythology, of football during my childhood. It is one of the few games from that era which has not been forgotten, and which most fans - and even many not so big football fans - have heard about. It feels like it was one of the biggest moments not just in sports in the sixties, but in sports, period. It literally helped to make the Super Bowl what it is today. 

The 1968 Baltimore Colts looked like they were going to be probably designated as the greatest and most dominant team in league history. They had the number two ranked offense that season, averaging just under 29 points per game, back in 1969. On defense, they allowed just over 10 points per game, on average. They started off 5-0, before losing to the Cleveland Browns by 10. They then finished the rest of the regular season with eight straight wins, soundly beat the Vikings by 10 in the divisional round, and avenged their only loss of the season to the Browns by crushing them, 34-0, in the Championship Game. They were prohibitive favorites over the New York Jets of the upstart AFL, a league then generally regarded as inferior. 

Of course, Joe Namath provoked the Colts, antagonized them, claiming that five AFL quarterbacks were better than Earl Morrall of the Colts. Namath also made the famous guarantee that the Jets would stun the sports world and beat the mighty Colts in Miami in Super Bowl III. It angered the Colts, but perhaps it also got in their heads. The defense was not quite as dominant as they were believed, as the Jets running game, and some timely passes by Namath, seemed to catch them off guard. But the real shock was the Colts offense, which missed one opportunity after another, and committed five turnovers in that game. By halftime, the Jets owned a 7-0 lead, and then added two field goals in the third quarter, and one more in the fourth, to basically put the game out of reach. Morrall was ineffective and was replaced by legendary Johnny Unitas, who led the Colts to their one and only touchdown for the game's final score of 16-7. But that was it. No miracle comeback, and nothing of the dominance that the Colts had displayed all season prior to that game. Like the 2007 New England Patriots, the 1968 Baltimore Colts were a historically dominant team who are nevertheless not only best remembered, but indeed have been immortalized, for their worst performance at the season. 

That seems, to me, an obvious choice for the most brutal playoff loss by the Colts organization. Hell, nobody even remembers the 2005 Colts. Yes, they were good, but they were far from the only number one seed to get upset and find themselves ousted from the postseason earlier than expected. That did not stand out to me at all, truth be told. Not like Super Bowl III, which made the Super Bowl, and arguably, the NFL itself, into what it is. And the Colts were the team on the wrong end of things on that fateful day. Brutal. 

Saturday, January 28, 2023

🏈🏈 NFL 2022-23 Playoffs NFC & AFC Championship Games Preview 🏈🏈

               



🏈🏈🏈🏈

 



Well, here we go. Championship Game weekend, with three of the four exact same teams that we saw play at this point last season. In fact, the AFC Championship is a rematch of last year's AFC title game, and will be played in the same venue. As for the NFC, the 49ers will be making their third appearance in four years in the NFC title game, while the Eagles were one of the preseason favorites, and enjoyed a dream season.

So it's all the truly quality teams who reached this point. And the thing is, there is not a mismatch here, at least looking at the teams as they get ready for these games. I could see any of these teams playing extremely well and winning, which is simply not the case in many seasons. Sometimes, you just feel like there is a team that is so clearly superior to their opponents, that you just figure that they will win, and perhaps easily. Then again, I had assumed that of Kansas City last season, and look what happened in that one.

It truly feels like any of these four teams could get hot and win the whole thing, and bring the Lombardi Trophy home with them. But only two of these teams will advance to the Super Bowl this weekend, while the other two will not have survived, and will face the unwelcome prospect of an off-season filled with questions. High stakes indeed.

Let's take a look at the games to be played this weekend:







AFC Championship Game







  Cincinnati Bengals


at 


Kansas City Chiefs




 


This is a rematch of last year's AFC title game. If you remember, the Bengals overcame an 18-point Chiefs lead, and on the road at Arrowhead, to come back and stun KC. Then, they themselves would suffer a tough defeat to the Rams in the Super Bowl.

That makes this game very intriguing. The Chiefs have every incentive to win, and exact a measure of revenge against Cincy. Meanwhile, the Bengals sure seem like a team on a mission, and that mission is not just to get back, but to win the Super Bowl.

The Bengals have now won 10 games in a row, a franchise best record. Joe Burrow looks like one of the great quarterbacks of this era, and he obviously adds some danger to the Cincinnati offense. And their defense is one of the league's best, and has gotten better as the season has worn on. They have kept opponents to well under 20 points in each of their last four games, including two playoff wins, and another "winner takes all" divisional showdown in the regular season finale. They not only beat the Chiefs at Arrowhead last season, but beat them a few weeks ago, in early December, as well. Their confidence has to be soaring to new heights at this point. 

However, the Chiefs have become the new steady force in the AFC, taking over for the New England Patriots dynasty. KC has qualified for a fifth straight AFC title game, which ranks among the very best such streaks for any team in NFL history, becoming only the third franchise to achieve that feat. Patrick Mahomes is probably the best quarterback in the league, and the Chiefs offense is, once again, probably the best in the entire league. Finally, they are extremely well coached. Andy Reid is easily one of the most successful coaches in the history of the NFL. He is currently tied with legendary Tom Landry for the second most playoff wins earned by a head coach, so this will be a chance to push him to sole possession of number two all-time. A win would also allow him to get to his fourth Super Bowl as a head coach. 

Just an amazing showdown, with so much at stake. And the thing is, these two teams feel like they are fairly evenly matched heading into this one. The Bengals are possibly playing better than any team in the league, and they seem to be one of the few teams that matches up well against the Chiefs. Yet, you cannot look past KC, one of the most explosive teams in the history of the league, especially when they play at Arrowhead Stadium.

It could go either way. But my pick in this one will be a win for the hometown team.


My pick: Kansas City







    

NFC Championship Game







San Francisco 49ers 



at



Philadelphia Eagles



      


After starting off the season as early preseason favorites, and then storming off to a very impressive 9-0 start, and then seemingly cruising to the number one seed and home field advantage when they stood at 13-1, the Eagles looked a bit shaky towards the end of the season. They dropped two straight games, and then needed a win in the regular season finale against the G-Men in order to secure the top spot.

But they got it. And then they took advantage of it like few teams have. They rested and refocused, and then showed just how good and ready they were by blowing out the Giants last week, 38-7. In the process, they looked like the same complete team that appeared to be the best in the league earlier this season. They enjoy home field advantage in this game, which can be huge, and they also enter with a seemingly head full of steam.

The 49ers, meanwhile, got off to a shaky start. They had all sorts of problems early on, and could not seem to get healthy. At 3-4, they hardly looked like a team that was meeting the lofty expectations that many people had.

Then, San Francisco simply went on a tear. They got healthier and better, and added running back Christian McCaffrey, who has remained a force. Their defense is ranked as the best in the league, and their offense can be explosive, with loads of talent. In short, many people see this as the best and most complete team in the league. Plus, they have plenty of playoff experience, as this will be their third NFC title game appearance in four seasons. And remember, they played in the Super Bowl just a few years ago.

That makes this a big showdown. Both teams look capable of playing well and possibly winning. It is difficult to know for sure who will emerge victorious in this one. 

Still, I have to make a pick, right? And right now, the 49ers look like they just might be the hottest team in the league. Again, they seem to get better week after week. It remains to be seen how they will adjust when they have to play on the road in this one, but I suspect that they will have just enough here to eke out a win against the favored Eagles. 

So my pick in this one is for the road team.


My pick: San Francisco

Iconic Archambault Store in Downtown Montréal Will Soon Close

Sad news for those who viewed the Archambault store in downtown Montréal as a local icon, which has stood now for decades. it was just announced that the store would be closing it's doors this coming summer, in June. 

Reading a bit about this store in recent days has been an eye-opening experience. I thought it was iconic, as well. But I had no idea just how long this building, and the store, for that matter, had stood at this particular location.  The thing is, this store actually is quite rich in history:

In 1930, Edmond Archambault built the seven-storey art deco building to house the music store he founded in 1896.  

Recognizing the significance of the location, Archambault said it will not request the store’s sign be removed following the closing.

It is one of the last major music store in a major city that I can think of. Stores like Tower Records and the Virgin Megastore and H and M, Sam Ash, Sam Goody, and others are seemingly almost all gone. I heard that there is one last Tower Records store left (at least a brick and mortar, physical store) in Tokyo, and that is it. There may be some others, as well, but none that are immediately coming to mind. 

There are also some mixed book and music stores, or book stores that also sold music and other things, like Gibert Jeune in Paris, or Renaud Bray, which still has several locations scattered across Québec province, including Montréal. And to be fair, there will still be 14 Archambault stores still in existence in Québec province. But this was perhaps the biggest and most iconic of them all.

Like with those stores previously mentioned, I had some history with this particular store. It was one of the automatic destinations for me whenever I happened to travel to Montréal. I cannot tell you just how many cd's and books I got there over the years, but it is fairly substantial. As were the memories, for that matter, which include visits to the place with family members and friends. Now, the place is going to be gone for good soon.

Some years ago, I still remember when the one in Vieux Québec closed. I did not know that it was closing, and happened to be present on one of the last days of it's existence. So I went ahead and went in and make a purchase or two. Those two Archambault stores became my main source of purchasing French music - with maybe the exception of the Virgin Music Megastore on the Champs-Élysées in Paris, from maybe around 1996 and for a decade and change more, perhaps possibly even longer than that.

Now, all of that seems to be fading. 

Years ago - back in the nineties - I remember that it seemed that my closest friend and I used to go to the Village in New York City just about every weekend, looking for rare finds at the music stores, which sold a lot of bootlegs. Neither of us made a lot of money at the time, but it was fin to take these adventures. But it seems like those days, and those kinds of adventures, are going away these days, and fast. Just about a year and a half ago, I took my son to Vintage Vinyl, one of the last stores specializing in selling music albums in New Jersey. Right now, I only know Sound Exchange in Wayne, and across the border in Pennsylvania, Spin Me Round. Maybe there is one or two of those kinds of stores left in the Village, or elsewhere in New York City, but maybe not. They are a dying breed, are they not? 








Archambault to close its iconic store at Ste-Catherine and Berri Sts. The longtime music and book retailer says changes in the area — including "vast construction sites" — have eroded commercial potential.  Author of the article:Montreal Gazette Published Jan 27, 2023:

https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/archambault-to-close-its-iconic-store-at-ste-catherine-and-berri-sts



Iconic downtown Montreal Archambault store to shut its doors this summer by Joe Bongiorno CBC News · Posted: Jan 27, 2023:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/archambault-closes-job-losses-1.6729148?fbclid=IwAR3S8HtlSw-sOCNOTucvpvhlLZybgJDq-vgnpO_Lt65VkVTUIp1tGKxSHVA

Friday, January 27, 2023

Vic DiBitetto Sounds Off on the M&M's Controversy And Rightly Asks What's Wrong With Americans For Focusing on Such Nonsense



Vic DiBitetto is a comedian with some serious anger issues. Sometimes, I find him funny, and feel that he makes some serious points along the way. More often, I almost feel worried for him, with a delivery where he seems to run out of breath, and seems on the verge of a heart attack.

This video clip is a little like that, as well. I warn you as a viewer: he is not for everyone. He uses strong language, and he yells. He yells loudly, and a lot.

Still, I think that he makes some valid points here in this one, as well. I remember when Starbuck coffee cups were in the news in the so-called "War Against Christmas" some years back. Now, it is the candy, M and M's that are in the news. DiBitetto rightly states that the rest of the world must be laughing at us and thinking that we are stupid for focusing on such ridiculous nonsense, when there is in fact no shortage of far more serious issues that we could and should be focused on. 

God help us.