On April 6 of this year, I wrote a piece titled "The
Criminalization of Affordable Healthcare in America", and made the strong
suggestion that the United States could ill afford to continue taking an
arrogant posture of superiority vis-à-vis the rest of the world in regards to
affordable healthcare solutions, and that, in fact, it could probably learn
some things be more closely paying attention to the example of other nations. I
stand by that, and think that this could be extended to other realms, as well.
I want to talk about another area where we have fallen far behind other
nations, that of education, which has been much in the news as of lately, since
the presumptive Republican Presidential candidate just proposed his own
platform on this issue – making sure to blast President Obama in the process,
predictably. Now, Mitt Romney was trying to score some points with the
electorate that he hopes elevates him to the White House later this year, and
he would be hard pressed to criticize President Obama too strongly, since Obama
largely just continued the educational policy of his predecessor, President
Bush, with his "No Child Left Behind" policy, a system of tasting
kids, and then holding the teachers and the schools accountable, and focusing
on raising test scores.
In an era when the focus for an apparent majority of Americans was on tax cuts
and cutting out wasteful government spending, and which also happened to
coincide with the alarming news that American students were ranking lower and
lower and falling farther and farther behind students in other nations in all
facets of education, the "No Child Left Behind" Act seemed a
convenient answer. It put the stress on standardized tests, and preparation for
those tests. In the meantime, teachers were to be held more accountable, which
sounded great for political speeches. This seemed to make complete sense for
many people, who saw in this a clear cut issue, as well as an easy scapegoat
for what is actually quite a complex problem, with no easy answers.
Bush made these changes, and the theory was that we did not
have to increase spending on education in order to improve it. It sounded great
to many people. But now, the schools are, once again, failing on a level, that
people are standing up and taking notice. The proof is in the pudding, as they
say. Like healthcare, education, and the poor results in comparison to students
of other nations, speaks for itself. It is an issue – a huge and polarizing
issue – with each election cycle. This year is proving to be yet another
example of it, to boot.
So, who's to blame in all of this? Teachers? Sometimes, yes. Parents? More
often than they themselves acknowledge, yes. The directors and higher-ups
within the school system? They certainly can accept a strong level of blame, as
well. Politicians, perhaps, or a monstrous and out of control government? An
inefficient and highly bureaucratic system where new teachers focus on ensuring
tenure for themselves rather than on providing top notch education is certainly
a huge problem, without doubt. Can we blame the kids, either individually or as
a whole? On some level, yes – at least by our own accepted ideology. Yet, this
sounds inherently unfair, does it not? After all, these problems are more
voiced and understood by adults, who have, after all, been entrusted with the
responsibility of educating their young. It is more the adults that are
failing, than the kids, and the poor results of the kids reflects poorly on the
adult society, since it shows a lack of true commitment, dedication, and focus
on such a crucial issue as education.
So, where else do we point the finger? Who can we blame, otherwise? Television,
perhaps? Movies? Video games? Popular or "dangerous" music? So we
perhaps blame ideology, conveniently pointing to the ideology that we are
opposed to?
Is the ailment more complicated and the problems more far reaching, yet subtle,
than all of this? Or are there perhaps real solutions somewhere?
That is a debate that rages on, and like the healthcare debate, it does not
appear that there are any clear winners – only losers. The main losers in all
of this? Our kids themselves, who are continually being given inadequate and
second-class education. In an increasingly competitive world, the American
education system as a whole is putting out a subpar product. This, from a
country that used to rank first in education some decades ago, during America 's
so-called "Golden Age". So, what happened? Why have we fallen so far,
so fast? More importantly, perhaps, what can we do to change it? Or can we
change it?
It seems to me that this is too crucial an issue for us not to at least
seriously try and change it. Albert Einstein famously once said, "We
cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created
them." We hear a lot of the expression to "think outside the
box", and this is usually applied for business or money-making purposes,
perhaps even twelve step programs or self-help books for financial guidance and
strategies for success. Yet, it seems to rarely be used in discussions on
education, but if we are to make effective, positive changes, perhaps that
needs to change.
So, allow me to indulge in my next blog by utilizing the example of some of
those other nations that have shot ahead of the United States , and see if we, the
supposed adults, can provide better and more effective lessons for our children
by learning some lessons ourselves. Let's start with the country that everyone
seems so enamored with right now because of their revolutionary approach to
education, and the country that now ranks as the leading country in the world
in terms of education: Finland
No comments:
Post a Comment