Wednesday, January 31, 2024

Movie Review: The Zone of Interest

So admittedly, I had not heard about this movie until some weeks ago. My girlfriend, who is Polish, had learned about it somewhere, and she told me that she wanted to see it. We watched the trailer, and it did indeed look intriguing, albeit unconventional.

The thing is, at first, it was only playing in theaters far from us. Neither of us wanted to go all the way to New York City to see a movie, so we put it on the backburner. The next time we checked, it was playing much closer, in New Jersey, at Rockaway (presumably by the mall). That I was willing to go to, and so we planned to make a date of it. When next I checked, it was playing even closer, right in Princeton, which is fairly close to us (less than 14 miles). We picked a day (earlier today), and went ahead and saw the movie.

Now, I am giving this movie review, but I will not warn about spoilers. Frankly, this is not a movie where you need to be warned all that much about spoilers, because it is not that kind of a movie. It basically takes place mostly in a house, located just outside of the walls of Auschwitz. And it focuses on everyday interactions within the family, without all that much going on. That probably sounds strange, but I will explain.

Christian Friedel gives a chilling performance as Rudolf Höss, and his wife Hedwig is played very convincingly by Sandra Hüller. The power of their performances is in the subtlety. Often times, you see Nazis portrayed, understandably, as monsters. What makes this movie chilling is how deliberately they are portrayed as very human, even boring in certain respects. Indeed, if you did not know that this was about Auschwitz, or did not pick up on some of the subtleties (or perhaps were unaware of the history), you might think that this is a movie where nothing really happens at all. 

And that is what I really liked about it. Because it gives you a very different perspective on the undeniably horrific chapter of Auschwitz, and the Holocaust more generally. We see the family of Rudolf Höss, the commandant of Auschwitz, living in a comfortable - even almost luxurious - home literally right next to the camp, close to the watch tower and literally right next to the gates, with the barbed wire visible on top. We see the family enjoying a luxurious lifestyle, for the most part, which we find out is better than anything they had been privy to before. It is clearly implied that this high standard of living that they enjoy so much clearly is the result of Höss's position at the now infamous death camp right next door. We hear them casually talking and even laughing about "Canada," which was a code word for storage facilities of stolen goods. We see Rudolph's wife Hedwig trying out a new fur coat, clearly recently stolen from some of the Jews taken to Auschwitz. They talk about how once, they found diamonds in toothpaste, and they tell laughingly tell each other how clever the Jews are. 

Repeatedly, we see just how beautiful and lush and large their garden is, which serves as a symbol for how their pristine lifestyle comes at the expense of those they have killed. It is clearly implied that the garden is lush for a reason, and that far from being picturesque and idyllic, it is in fact a horror. Indeed, their dream life is a result of the forced slavery which they subject others to, as the only Jews shown in this movie are quiet servants, almost exclusively in the background. 

The discussions are eerily normal. They do not sound remarkably different from conversations that most families in Western countries regularly have. The mother loves the home, loves that standard of living, and how it seems so healthy and good for the children. Rudolf Höss is pleased that he is finally receiving real recognition for his work ethic and efficiency, and receiving promotions. We also see them get in an argument about the bureaucracy, which is about to take them away to another camp, against their wishes. 

I remember when younger, that my father and I discusses the Holocaust. And what he said was that the real horror of the Holocaust was the bureaucratic nature of it. Often times in movies, you see the worst crimes imaginable done in the heat of the moment. Sometimes, you even see the ones responsible feeling remorse for it. That was what makes this movie so different, and really, so chilling. Because while the crimes against humanity, the mass murder of Jews and others literally right next door, and the mass incarcerations of tens of thousands of people at a time is literally right next door, you almost get the sense that these people hardly notice it. The yells and occasional gunshots serve as background noise. And the ones responsible for carrying out the Holocaust - this mass murder of "undesirables" in Europe, particularly Jews - talk about how greater efficiency can be achieved, much like corporations talk matter of factly about greater efficiency and pursuing greater profits today. You see people being congratulated on promotions and recognition for good work in ways that are not all that different than today. Only they are being recognized and promoted for their part in the bureaucratic mass murder of millions of people! These enormous and horrifying crimes are not done in the heat of passion, but with a cold, unfeeling, bureaucratic approach. And that is what makes this movie so chilling. That's what makes the Holocaust even more horrifying, when you really think about it.

Now, this is an unconventional movie. Again, it is a bit slow, especially if you do not get all of the references. There definitely are signs that something is really, really wrong, but you almost have to look for those signs. It is a movie about the Holocaust, but shown from the perspective of perpetrators, who were mostly living their everyday life, and not really all that bothered by the magnitude of what they themselves were responsible for.

In an age when it seems like much of the world is moving dangerously to political extremes, and both hate speech and hate crimes seem to be spiking in many places all at once (including in the United States), this movie serves as a warning. It shows that seemingly normal people, at least outwardly, are capable of great evils that might seem unimaginable to us. Too often, historical figures who we regard as monsters are almost portrayed as caricatures, and they can be hard to relate to. What makes this movie scary is that the family that we see on the screen seems, at least on the surface, astonishingly normal. And they put on that front of normalcy even while all sorts of horrors are happening all around them, and which they are very much a part of and responsible for. That is a very frightening thought. Perhaps especially now, in this day and age, when we seem to be so willing to repeat the mistakes of the not-so-distant past.

A very good movie, and highly recommended!





The Zone of Interest | Official Trailer HD | A24 

Some Famous Songs That Are Not Played On the Radio Anymore

Below is a list of songs that were, for some reason or other, taken off the radio at various times, and for different reasons or rationales.







Iconic Songs No Longer Allowed On The Radio

David Lee Roth Goes On the Attack Against Wolfgang Van Halen

 

Wolfgang Van Halen and his band, Mammoth WVH, performing during a show at MetLife Stadium in 2021


Recently, David Lee Roth badmouthed a former bandmate, who also happens to be the son of another former bandmate of his.

Yes, Roth insulted Wolfgang Van Halen in a long and rather strange, somewhat seemingly unhinged, tirade. Here is what he said, specifically:

“This fucking kid, he’s complaining the entire tour like I’m not paying enough attention to him on stage. Like Santa Claus coming down the chimney and popping out on Christmas with nobody paying attention. Shalom to the dome, homie. I’m giving him the best. Everything I’ve got in front of twenty, thirty thousand people at a clip, and he’s complaining to everybody around me — the business manager, the security guy, the clothing lady — ‘Dave’s not paying enough attention to me.’ Cut to New York City — glamorous, glistening, shimmering New York City, and we’re at Jones Beach with twenty thousand of my closest friends. I walk out into the middle of the stage and I’m gonna do ‘Ice Cream Man’, and I’m testifying to the brothers, Eddie [Van Halen] and Al [Alex Van Halen], ‘Man, this is how many times we’ve played New York. This is spectacular.’ And what I don’t know is this kid, this schlemiel kid, has commandeered a couple of monkeys to go in back, behind my back, over to the side of the stage and throw out these two great dames that I invited to be my guests to the show. And these dames are in their forties, okay? Business women. In fact, you aren’t gonna believe this shit. This fucking kid, what he doesn’t know is that these two dames work for the accounting firm that represent him, not me. But as usual, he, just like his uncle and his uncle’s brother, stiffed them for tickets. I know they’re gonna do that, so I got ahead of things and I give them tickets. I put ’em way off to the side. And I’m not talking about Mötley Crüe groupies here. This is the real deal. And they’re both carrying big satchel purses, right? Like Gucci. Here we go. And he throws them out of the building. He’s teaching me a lesson. What this fucking kid doesn’t know, they’re carrying the paychecks for all 82 people on the road crew. Nobody tells me till I’m parked in the middle of that fuckin bridge… You know fuckin’ Jones Beach, they think I’m gonna freak out. I laughed so hard I spilled my Snapple.    

Here is a summary from a recent Rolling Stone article on the subject:

In his video, Roth repeatedly calls Wolfgang “this fuckin’ kid,” as well as a “schlemiel” (“fool” in Yiddish), mocks him for benefiting from nepotism, and gripes about Wolfgang allegedly ordering the removal of an accountant from a backstage area after supposedly mistaking her for Roth’s girlfriend. A representative for Wolfgang Van Halen wasn’t immediately available for comment.  

The video begins with a vicious mock interview that paints Wolfgang — who replaced original Van Halen bassist Michael Anthony — as “Jesus Christ.”  

“Bro, I want people to know I got this job because of my talent,” faux-Wolfgang says. “I would have this job anyway, even if my dad wasn’t God. I just want people to know I got this job because of my talent.” A rep for David Lee Roth didn’t have any additional comment.

For his part, Wolfgang Van Halen seems to rise above that kind of nonsense:

Back in 2021, Wolfgang spoke about Roth in an interview with Heavy Consequence when it had been reported that the singer was set to play his last shows ever at a Las Vegas residency. He told us, “Dave is … very much a one-of-a-kind sort of guy. We don’t really talk, if ever. We were always cordial on tour together, but it’s not like I’ve spoken to him at all in the last six years. But, I mean, he’s fucking David Lee Roth. I’m so happy for him and for everything that he’s accomplished. And he’s just a phenomenal… He’ll always be one of the best.”

Still, WVH did level some more toned down shots at Roth:

Wolfgang has avoided direct criticism of Roth, though he did imply in a 2022 Rolling Stone interview that the singer was the reason a planned tribute concert for Eddie Van Halen didn’t happen. “There are some people that make it very difficult to do anything when it comes to Van Halen,” Wolfgang said. “From my time in Van Halen, there was always some stuff that gets in the way from just making music and having a good time. And, I think that’s what happened…. The fact that in my tenure, in Van Halen, we managed to do three tours, put an album of original material and a live album out is a fucking miracle… Apparently, some people are too full of themselves to let other people have a good time.”





Below are the articles which I used in writing this particular blog entry, and from which I obtained the quotes used in the same:



David Lee Roth Fires Shots at Wolfgang Van Halen: ‘This F-ckin’ Kid’ by Brian Hiatt,  January 24, 2024

In a new YouTube video, Van Halen singer David Lee Roth launches a sudden verbal attack on his one-time bandmate, the son of the late Eddie Van Halen  

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/david-lee-roth-wolfgang-van-halen-youtube-attacks-1234953442/



David Lee Roth Goes Scorched Earth on Wolfgang Van Halen: “This F**kin’ Kid” The singer suggests that Wolfgang benefitted from nepotism, among other accusations

https://consequence.net/2024/01/david-lee-roth-vs-wolfgang-van-halen/





Wolfgang Van Halen and his band, Mammoth WVH, performing during last evening's show.








David Lee Roth Goes Nuclear On Wolfgang Van Halen

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

A Video Clip of Air Traffic Around the World

Saw this some weeks ago, but never quite got around to publishing it.

Still, I thought it was fascinating. And it seemed worth sharing here.

Take a look, and enjoy:




This is how Daily world air traffic looks

Top People on Buffalo Bills Are Not Dismantling Team & Believe Super Bowl Window Not Yet 'Closed'

   






We now know who will compete in the coming Super Bowl. It will be the defending champs, the Kansas City Chiefs, versus the San Francisco 49ers. A rematch of Super Bowl LIV, in other words.

Nobody is really shocked by either team getting there, I don't think. 

However, it feels like the Buffalo Bills were getting really hot towards the end of this season. They went on a massive winning streak of five games, digging themselves out of being the 11th seed - where they seemed to be well out of the playoff picture - to going all the way up to the second seed. I've never seen a team with so little time left in the season rise from such depths and reach such heights. 

Then, they won their first playoff game against the Pittsburgh Steelers, and convincingly. I actually thought that they would beat the Chiefs in the divisional round. Certainly, they had their chances.  

In the end, it was not meant to be. They watched the AFC title game, just like the rest of us. Much as they have since the 2020 season, when they reached the AFC Championship Game for the first time since the 1990's. That's three seasons and counting.

This last playoff loss to the Chiefs - the third time in four years where the Bills have been eliminated by them - felt particularly devastating. It was a real punch in the gut. Because the Bills always seem to enjoy success against KC in the regular season, including a solid win over them this year, at Arrowhead. And finally, we manage to get them up in Buffalo, in January, when it sure appeared that the Chiefs had lost something of their championship swagger. And instead, Kansas City suddenly turns it up a notch, precisely in that game. As soon as I saw that, I had a feeling that they would get back to the Super Bowl.

Enough people were broken up about the loss, that they seemed to panic. It seemed that for many Bills fans, all hope was lost. Being eliminated three times in four years by the same team? Only three teams that I can think of suffered such indignities, being eliminated by the same team in the playoffs, year after year like that. The Cleveland Browns in the 1980's kept losing to the Denver Broncos in the AFC Championship Games. The Green Bay Packers in the first half of the nineties kept losing to the Dallas Cowboys. And the San Francisco 49ers kept losing to the Green Bay Packers in the mid to late nineties. That last one might be the most promising one, because after getting eliminated by Green Bay in three successive postseasons, the 49ers finally did beat them - barely, and with a controversial non-call, to boot - in the next postseason.

The thing is, you never know what is going to happen. Bills fans have long felt like a tormented lot. This was the only franchise in history - not just NFL history, but in North American sports history - to have reached the championship level four years in a row, only to lose all four times. Yes, the Bills made some history in the nineties. They pulled off what I still think ranks as the greatest, most impressive comeback in NFL history (it still feels more impressive than Minnesota's 33-point comeback to the Colts in 2022). Also, they became the first and only team to have reached the Super Bowl four times in a row. Yet, they lost all four times.

And now, they once again have an enormously talented roster, on both sides of the ball. They have an excellent coach, one of the elite quarterbacks in the league, and a dangerously explosive offense. Also, a solid defense. But they keep falling short. Again, three postseason exits at the hands of the Chiefs, and one by the Bengals (also with Buffalo hosting) in the year in between. 

Not surprising that Bills fans were kind of despairing. It really feels dangerously close to déjà vu.

Again, though, you never know what is going to happen. Teams - even dynasties - can fall apart remarkably quickly, and without warning. That happened to the Buffalo Bills of the nineties themselves after those four straight Super Bowl appearances. It happened to the Dallas Cowboys after they won their third (and as it turns out, their final) Super Bowl in the nineties. It happened to the San Francisco 49ers in the late nineties. It happened to the Green Bay Packers after they lost to the Denver Broncos in a huge upset in Super Bowl XXXII, after they had proclaimed themselves the new dynasty of the NFL. It happened to the Seattle Seahawks, also after they fell just short of back-to-back Super Bowl titles with a very controversial (and obviously heartbreaking) loss. It happened to the dynasty New England Patriots in the second half of the 2019 season, after they raced out to an impressive 8-0 start, and looked to one and all to have a real shot at qualifying for the Super Bowl for what would have been a fourth straight year, which would have tied the one Super Bowl record that the Bills still manage to own, for better or worse.

And win or lose this coming Super Bowl, it could happen to the Chiefs, too. Yes, they look damn good, and yes, Patrick Mahomes will surely be there for years. Probably Travis Kelce will be there for a few years to come, as well, although he is getting up there in terms of years now for a professional athlete. But there are also whispers that Andy Reid may step down. And again, rarely do teams make it to three straight Super Bowls (only the Dolphins in the 1970's, the Bills in the 1990's, and the Patriots in the 2010's managed the feat). If indeed the Chiefs do win this Super Bowl to earn back-to-back title, then they will have the same problem that other such champions have faced, because nobody to date has ever even reached a Super Bowl after winning the prior two Super Bowls, let alone won three straight Super Bowls. The San Francisco 49ers came reasonably close in 1990, as did the Dallas Cowboys in 1994. But close was not good enough.

All that is to say that there may be a path for this still talented Buffalo Bills team to reach the Super Bowl in the near future. They were right there, right in the thick of the race this season, and have ranked among the relative elite teams in the league for years now. Yes, they have a real shot.

So I for one am glad that the Bills brass is not dismantling this team, after falling short of their high expectations. They still have a shot at getting where they and their fans want them to go. So why scrap one of the best teams that Buffalo has ever seen?




Bills brass confident Super Bowl window not 'closed,' won't hit reset: 'We're disappointed ... not broken' by Bryan DeArdo  Jan 23, 2024:

Buffalo will continue to press on after falling short of its ultimate goal  

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/bills-brass-confident-super-bowl-window-not-closed-wont-hit-reset-were-disappointed-not-broken/?fbclid=IwAR3SASppE3Q-WzbAuNywfhxsJcvWEDaiUCx3nZedmS4ifrJc79L3AlRvYiE



So What's Next For The Buffalo Bills

George Carlin Would Not Have Been Surprised By World As It Now Finds Itself









George Carlin was known in his times for being one of the best and most powerful comedians. Mostly, it was because he cut through the bullshit, and told it as it was. In fact, I think that part of his draw was not just that he made people laugh, but that he was such a breath of fresh air. People actually like not being lied to every now and then (although not nearly as often as they probably think, because most people really do like embellishing in a worldview filled with lies, and they like reinforcement of that world of lies). 

Now to be fair, Carlin died long before this whole Trump nonsense began. After all, Carlin died in 2008. Sure, Trump was around at the time, and he had been famous for many years, even decades. It was just that he had not yet run for public office, much less the White House yet. And while Carlin did predict that the United States would someday embrace a dictatorship, he could not specifically have known that Donald Trump would edge the country so much closer to exactly that kind of a scenario. 

That said, I hardly think that he would have been surprised. Admittedly, the fact that it was Donald Trump was a bit surprising to me. I mean, for superficial reasons, I could understand the draw, based on the fact that he has blond hair and blue eyes, and is wealthy and entitled, and all of that. However, Trump also seems to epitomize the untrustworthy, city-slicker kind of figure, and he also hardly seems sincere about embracing traditional religious values. Thus, it seems to me a bit surprising that people from more rural regions would actually have come to embrace such a man as this. 

Still, it has somehow come to pass. I once suspected that the American people were collectively stupider than most people gave them credit for, but Carlin would not have been surprised, as this video attests. Admittedly, even I was surprised, beginning with how disingenuous the arguments for the invasion of Iraq were (still can't get past how easily they swallowed the argument of Saddam being an immediate threat to world peace, having a 45-minute response time and all that, while also paradoxically being so weak militarily that he would be defeated within six days or six weeks). Nor could I understand the related embrace by the majority of Americans that George W. Bush was such a successful president, that he deserved another four years. Then, eight years later, the most devastating wake-up call yet, that enough Americans (never quite a majority to date, thankfully, but still) would embrace Trump and all that he stood for, that he would officially win the 2016 election and officially become our elected leader, the face and the voice of our nation around the world for four long years. 

Apparently, I must have gotten wiser since then. 

Why would I say that? 

Because it no longer surprises me that a hell of a lot of Americans (again, still not a majority, but probably enough to give him a real shot at the presidency once again) feel that Trump was a good enough president to give him another four years in the White House. In fact, I have suspected for a long time that Trump would win another term, even if, admittedly, I never hoped to be wrong on anything in my life as much as this. Still, I am old enough - and hopefully mature enough - to understand that what we want to have happen will not necessarily actually happen in real life. I did not want the invasion of Iraq to happen, but knew that it would in the months and months leading up to it. Nor did I want to believe that Bush would win re-election in 2004, but I somehow knew that he would. A lot of people were surprised by my prediction, and mistakenly assumed that I wanted it to happen, which could not have been farther from the case. Again, though, there is a big difference between wanting something not to happen, and expecting as a result of this that it will not happen.

That is why I am resigned to the very real possibility - I would even suggest the probability - that Trump will win the upcoming election. No, I do not want this to happen. Still, all of the signs point to it. The man has the luck of the devil himself. Previous presidents on both sides of the political divide - Reagan, Clinton, and the second Bush - were often labeled as "the Teflon President," but Trump really was the real deal in that regard. He has regularly weathered massive storms that surely would have buried literally anyone else's chances, or their presidency. The pattern is that this obscenely entitled and pampered man gets himself in trouble precisely because of this false sense of entitlement, and then somehow, through a mixture of naivete on the part of others, as well as his own financial (and increasingly, media) power, as well as his admittedly genius instincts (not the "very stable genius" that he credits himself for, but still) of self-preservation, he not only survives all of this, but thrives as a result of them. Not only does he survive, but he grows more popular, and thus more powerful, as a result of it. Now, he poses the greatest threat to our American democracy that likely has ever existed, with the possible exception of the events leading up to the Civil War. Really, it feels like the United States has never been so close to simply abandoning the pretense of being an enlightened, modern nation, and a democratic one at that. Increasingly, we seem to be testing the waters of having a new kind of totalitarianism thrust upon us - and entirely voluntarily, to boot! Nothing could be easier than avoiding this, if we wanted it, and valued things like democracy, or honesty, or integrity, and truth. Yet, far too many Americans these days seem to bend over backwards and go out of their way to stick their heads in the sand. And I'm not just accusing right-leaning Trump supporters in this regard, either. Idiocy and blindness (and a collective sense of false entitlement) seems to have become our national pastime in recent years, even decades. 

Another person who, I strongly suspect, would not be surprised? George Carlin.

Take a look at the video below, and see why that is: 





George Carlin's Grim Warning Has Turned Into Reality

Monday, January 29, 2024

Carl Sagan Blasted the Mainstream Media in 1987 For Blocking Out Coverage of Science - And He Was Right

"Short term advantage for the network, long term disaster for the country."

 - Carl Sagan on the mainstream media's de facto blackout of all things science, back in 1987


Back in 1987, Carl Sagan levelled some serious criticism at the mainstream media. He said that science was not really covered at all, because it required thinking. The mainstream media outlets were keen on short term profits, not on what was good for the country. So science was shut out, much to the detriment of the country.

That was what Sagan said almost fourty years ago now.

And man, was he ever right on the money. Take a look by clicking on the links below:




"Short term advantage for the network, long term disaster for the country."


Carl Sagans Calls Out Mainstream Media:

https://youtube.com/shorts/rHg1sgjAKHo?si=cH-mQhNb_LxyybSQ



Wonder of Science @wonderofscience Carl Sagan calling out the mainstream media in 1987.  

From  Arve 𝕏 ㊷ 

8:40 AM · Dec 13, 2023 · 573.7K  Views 1,691  Reposts 138  Quotes 6,296  Likes 662  Bookmarks

https://twitter.com/wonderofscience/status/1734931175180009934

NFL 2023-24 Playoffs AFC Championship Game Review: Chiefs Drown Ravens in Low Scoring, Defesnive Battle in Baltimore

 




🏈🏈🏈🏈
















Kansas City Chiefs





at 






Baltimore Ravens






Kansas City Chiefs 17, Baltimore Ravens 10


I expected the Chiefs to win this game, and largely off the strength of their defense. 

Still, it surprised me just how low-scoring this game proved to be.

When Kansas City kicked the field goal to give themselves a 17-7 lead at halftime, I expected the scoring to continue for both teams. If you had told me that KC would not score again in the game, I would have thought that the Ravens surely would win the game.

As good as KC's defense is, though, I did not think that they would reduce Baltimore to just three points throughout the second half, and that the field goal would come in the final minutes of the game, giving the Ravens one last prayer with time quickly running out. 

The Chiefs dominated the time of possession, holding onto the ball for 37 minutes and 30 seconds. That is a remarkable amount of time, and it seemed to work well. The Chiefs defense held the Ravens in check, and it surely helped that the offense was off the field for such long stretches at a time. They just never got much of a chance to find any kind of rhythm. 

Also, Baltimore committed three turnovers, while KC had none. When you have that combination working against you, it's going to be tough to beat anybody.

Yes, the Ravens appeared to be the best team in the AFC, if not the entire NFL, for most of the season. But the reason I predicted a Chiefs win is simply that they are champions. They know what it takes, having been there before. There is a reason why they have reached the AFC Championship Game six years in a row now, and are going to the Super Bowl for a fourth time in five years. For that matter, there is a reason why they won two recent Super Bowls, and were the defending champs this year.

Kansas City looked hot and elite early in the season. Then, slowly but surely, they began to wane just a bit, losing games that most expected them to win. At one point, they were 8-6, and only one game ahead of the Broncos in the AFC West. It did not even appear certain that they would be in the playoffs, the way things were going.

However, here they are. They seemed to turn it up a notch or two as soon as the playoffs began. Suddenly, they look like the same team that has dominated the league in recent seasons. That is why they are heading back to the Super Bowl, and will have another chance to win another Lombardi Trophy, and cement their status as a dynasty.

My pick: Accurate

NFL 2023-24 Playoffs NFC Championship Game Review: Detroit Lions Blow Big Halftime Lead & Lose to San Francisco

     




🏈🏈🏈🏈








NFC Championship Game








Detroit Lions




at





San Francisco 49ers





San Francisco 49ers 34, Detroit Lions 31


I really feel for Lions fans. It had been a very long time - decades - since they enjoyed the kind of season that the team had this year. They finally win a playoff game for the first time in over three decades. Then they follow that up with another playoff win that sends them to only their second NFC Championship Game appearance in the Super Bowl era. Once there, they jump out ahead and taken a big lead against the hometown - and heavily favored - San Francisco 49ers.

And then they collapse and lose, just when they can almost taste what would have been the first Super Bowl appearance in franchise history. 

Really, this was a tale of two halves. The first half belonged to Detroit. They ran very effectively, and their offense was really rolling. Their defense was seriously keeping the explosive Niners in check. Indeed, the Lions looked like champions. 

Then came the second half, and it was a different story. The 49ers got the ball first in the second half, and managed to score a field goal on that first possession. Still, that was somewhat of a victory for the Lions, holding San Fran to just a field goal.

Now here is where I feel Detroit began to make mistakes and, ultimately, to self-destruct. On their first drive of the second half, the Lions moved the ball well, and still seemed to have momentum. However, the drive ultimately did stall, although the Lions were still in positon for a field goal attempt. To me, when you're up still by 14 points, it feels like you need to go for the safe points. Get the lead back up to 17, make it a threee possession game. Instead, they took a gamble and went for it on fourth down. They didn't make it. And it felt like the momentum had shifted.

This became obvious just minutes later, when San Francisco quarterback Brock Purdy went deep, looking to complete it to receiver Brandon Aiyuk. The ball was a little off target, and hit Lions cornerback Kindle Vildor right in the helmet, and then took a lucky bounce right into the arms of Aiyuk. The Niners were on the doorstep, just feet from a touchdown that would get them very much in the game again. They got it just a couple of plays later.

Then Detroit's offense was not producing anything, while the 49ers kept scoring. Again, I don't want to harp on the subject, but Detroit took too many chances. It felt to me like if the Lions simply go for that field goal in the third quarter, and get the lead back up to 17, that they keep the momentum. They already had a decent lead of 14 points, so why do you need to tempt fate and take huge risks, especially since the 49ers had just scored, and the fan base was trying to pump thei hometeam up? Get a field goal to nulify San Francisco's own field goal earlier, then try and get a good kick and pin the Niners deep in their own territory. 

Taking those kinds of risks - and the Lions took quite a few in this game - just felt unnecessary. I don't mean to second guess Detroit's head coach Dan Campbell, who did simply a phenomenal job, and has deservedly received some recognition for it. But it just felt really risky. at the time. And as it turns out, it feels like it cost them the game. I mean, they lost by a field goal. Maybe if they go for that field goal and convert in the third quarter, and manage to piun San Francisco deep in their own territory for the next drive, perhaps they prevent suc a dramatic shift in momentum. Maybe they are now celebrating, and preparing for the first ever Super Bowl appearance in franchie history. 

Statistically, the Lions had an impressive game, and beat the 49ers in some important categories. They produced more total yards of offense, 442 to 413 for San Fran.They got more overall yardage wihth both their passing game and their running game. they earned 28 first downs, to just 23 for the Niners. They converted on one fourth down gamle, while the 49ers did not get any fourth down conversions. The two teams were even with one turnover apiece.

But this felt like a painful collapse for the Lions. They lost their composure, and ultimately, lost the game. Too bad. 

Still, Detroit clearly has built something positive. Itshould bode well for them in the near future, and they should see success.

As for the 49ers, they win another NFC Championship for the eighth time. They will meet the Kansas City Chiefs, who handed the 49ers their own painful loss after a 10-point lead in the fourth quarter was quickly erased by a suddenly rejuvated Kansas City offense. The 49ers will get another chance now.


My pick: Accurate

Sunday, January 28, 2024

NFL 2023-24 Playoffs NFC Championship Game Preview: Detroit Lions Hope to Extend Cinderella Postseason Against San Francisco

    




🏈🏈🏈🏈








NFC Championship Game








Detroit Lions




at





San Francisco 49ers





Detroit Lions (14-5) at San Francisco 49ers (13-5)


In what had been a remarkable season, capped by a Cinderella run in the postseason, the Detroit Lions have managed to reach the NFC Championship Game for only the second time since 1957. Incidentally, 1957 was the last time that the Lions were NFL champions. But this has been the most successful season that the Lions have had since then. They and their fans should be happy with this season, and with the team's remarkable postseason success to this point.

Now the last time that they reached the NFC Championship, they got absolutely blown out. That was in the 1991-92 season, and they ran into an absolute juggernaut in Washington, a team that likely does not get the respect that it deserves. They were truly dominant that season, as the Lions found out the hard way. They lost that NFC Championship Game 41-10, which was not nearly as bad as their 45-0 loss in Washington during the regular season.

While I don't expect the Lions to get completely dismantled like that this time around, I have serious doubts about their chances going on the road to the West Coast and facing the 49ers. San Francisco is a team with a hell of a lot of talent on both sides of the ball. They also have excellent coaching. There are stars on both sides of the ball. Also, they have a ton of recent playoff experience. Remember, they have now qualified for the NFC Championship Game three years in a row, and four of the past five seasons overall. Also, they reached the Super Bowl five years ago. 

So experience definitely goes on the side of the 49ers. Also, I expect that their defense will prove tougher. They are a very physical team, and while they struggled at times against Green Bay last weekend, they ultimately shut down that dangerous Packers offense when they had to. As for offense, this team has a tremendous amount of talent. A top notch running back in Christian McCaffrey, and some dangerous receivers that will likely stretch that Detroit defense. 

About the only question I still have regarding the 49ers offense would be with quarterback Brock Purdy. Remember, he is still very young. If there is one thing which I suspect the Lions defense may have success in, it is if they manage to put pressure on Purdy, and force him to make mistakes. Both the Vikings and the Ravens managed to force him into throwing interceptions, and Detroit might really have a chance if they can force him into similar circumstances. 

However, Purdy has looked very solid, generally speaking. Yes, he is young, but he appears to have a bright future as the Niners quarterback. If he gets protection and avoids mistakes, he should prove to be an asset for the 49ers, and can help them to win and lift up another NFC Championship trophy.

Detroit's Jared Goff can help his team with his own experience. Remember, he led the 2018 Rams to the Super Bowl. He knows all about winning playoff games, which he did both in Los Angeles and now, with the Lions. If he keeps his cool and does not make mistake, there is no reason why the Lions cannot put some points on the board and make a good run at this thing. If running back Jahmyr Gibbs can break free at times and keep the 49ers defense busy, then that could help open up the passing attack, where Goff can really give Detroit a chance for an upset.

Still, all in all, I suspect that the 49ers have made serious runs in the playoffs in recent seasons for a reason. They likely are the more complete team. They struggled more than expected to beat the Packers in the divisional round, and they may have some difficulties in this one. However, I do expect that the Niners will win this one in the end.


My pick: San Francisco 49ers

NFL 2023-24 Playoffs AFC Championship Game Preview: KC Chiefs Visit Baltimore & Will Try to Secure Dynasty Status




🏈🏈🏈🏈
















Kansas City Chiefs





at 






Baltimore Ravens






Kansas City Chiefs (13-6) at Baltimore Ravens (14-4)


If the Chiefs were to extend their dynasty this postseason, they would need to rise above their level of play through the regular season. So far through two games, they have been doing just that.

Yes, the Chiefs dominated the Dolphins in the Wild Card game at frigid Arrowhead Stadium. That much was to be expected. After all, there was no question about just how tough the Chiefs can be in the playoffs when playing in Kansas City. They have hosted the five previous AFC Championship Games, and won three of the last four AFC Championships. Also, the Dolphins were pretty much down on their luck going in, having largely deflated towards the end of the season. They looked predictably flat in icy Kansas City, and the Chiefs were the beneficiaries of that match-up.

But last weekend, the Chiefs won an especially impressive game. This was the first time in the Mahomes era that they were forced to go on the road for a postseason game, not including the Super Bowls. And you know what? They likely played their most impressive game of the season. No, they did not blow the Bills out. However, they won, and likely more convincingly than the final score would suggest. It felt like the defense really stepped up big when they had to against the Bills, and really clamped down on Buffalo's "O" in the second half in particular. Also, their offense looked almost as explosive as in recent years, which was something we did not see much from that offense throughout most of this season. 

So that is the good news.

The bad news? 

Well, Buffalo really enjoyed a lot of success running against KC's defense. For long stretches of that game, the Bills seemed to be controlling the clock and the momentum by seemingly pushing the Chiefs around, and exhausting them. True, the Chiefs defense recovered and played well enough to win in the second half. But they likely will be tested by the Ravens own running game, which could prove challenging. 

The major question for KC's defense, as with every defense that has to go up against the Ravens, is how well they handle the challenge of Lamar Jackson. Jackson has been a star for many years, and he is a finalist for this year's NFL MVP award. If he wins, it would be for the second time in his career already. He can beat defenses with either his legs or his arm, and poses a double threat. It's a situation where opposing defense kind of have to pick their poison. To say that Kansas City's defense will have their hands full is a bit of an understatement. 

Baltimore enjoyed a hugely successful season. Their offense proved to be one of the most explosive in the league, and their defense was the stingiest in the league. They allowed the least points of any team, although it should be noted that number two on that list was none other than the Kansas City Chiefs. So I would not be surprised if this proves to be a low-scoring  contest dictated by the defenses. The scary thought is that both the Chiefs and the Ravens have shown an ability to win either in a shootout, or in a low-scoring contest. Certainly, both teams are aware of this. 

Not sure how much the home field advantage will benefit the Ravens. The Chiefs are not concerned with cold weather, obviously, as they beat the Dolphins in frozen Arrowhead two weekends ago, and then beat the Bills up in icy Buffalo last Sunday. Also, the Ravens, if anything, were better on the road this season than they were at home.

Expect a tough, grueling game. Baltimore will surely test just how effective KC's running defense, which will prove a big challenge. If the Ravens win, it likely will have a lot to do with that, and with them controlling the clock. 

However, I do expect that the Chiefs will show up in top form. Something about Patrick Mahomes at quarterback, and Andy Reid at coach, seems to give KC a chance in every playoff game that they play. Even when they lose - except for that one blowout loss to the Bucs in the Super Bowl a few years ago - it seems that the Chiefs are right there. They are in every game. And I expect that to be the difference. Kansas City just has a ton of experience, and as they did with Buffalo, they should be able to exploit another team's past playoff demons and, in the end, lift up another AFC Championship trophy.



My pick: Kansas City

Sunday Funny: Comedian Drew Michael Takes Aim at Dorky Sports Culture

Today is the day when it is determined which two teams will participate in the Super Bowl. The AFC and NFC Championship Games will take place later on, and at the end of the day, we will know which two franchises will qualify for this upcoming Super Bowl. 

So it is a day when people - traditionally predominately men - sit around and watch football games, often getting rowdy in the process. More often than not, it is also a day to eat junk, like Buffalo wings and/or pizza and/or burgers and hot dogs and/or potato chips and all manner of other crap. 

Oh, and beer. A ton of beer will be consumed.

In the spirit of this sports day, I thought it might be appropriate to poke a little fun at sports culture, particularly here in the United States.

Below is a link to a video clip featuring comedian Drew Michael, who is pretty funny here. He compares the culture of passionate Star Wars fans - whom he refers to as "dorks" - with sports fans, who often engage in precisely the same kind of behavior. And he makes some decent points, to boot.

Take a look:




sports fans are dorks.  

4.7K views 3 months ago  

Drew Michael

https://youtube.com/shorts/avK3PKHNjvA?si=buHHTLjV4iPMpYzy

Saturday, January 27, 2024

Today Marks the Anniversary of Super Bowl XXV

  



Yes indeed, today is the 30th anniversary of this incredible game! The Giants just scraping by the high-powered offense of the Buffalo Bills after a barely missed field goal, just one week after just surviving the dynasty 49ers because of a field goal made on the game's final play. Those two teams - the 49ers and the Bills in 1990 - were truly awesome, and fearsome to have to go against. Indeed, the Giants wound up beating them both in January to win their second Super Bowl championship in five years, but they lost to both teams in December. They lost the highly anticipated Monday Night Football game at San Francisco, and then lost to the Bills in the Meadowlands, at home in Giants Stadium, two weeks after that. That was the reason why the Giants were pretty serious underdogs going into both games. 

The background is all there, and I have written about it numerous times. I have also said on numerous occasions that, in fact, the Giants win over San Francisco in the NFC Championship Game was my favorite NFL game of all time, with the Super Bowl win against Buffalo a close second. But in fact, I think that it would have felt incomplete had the Giants lost the Super Bowl. The 49ers game would have felt like a consolation, but since the Giants won and became champions, it felt almost like a pre-coronation. The Giants had to survive not one but two teams potentially capable of winning the Super Bowl, which was tough. They ended a dynasty in San Francisco one week, and then just held off a seeming budding dynasty in Buffalo the next weekend in Tampa. 

They beat the 49ers in January 20th, and then just held off the Bills on January 27th, just one week later. As a Giants fan, there has never been another week to rival it. Indeed, it felt magical, almost like a fairy tale. You would almost think that they were destined to win, if you were not aware of how hard it was for them to win, how narrowly they escaped in both of those games. They overcame a lot of odds and obstacles, including three losses in a four game stretch, the loss of their starting quarterback, and not one, but two teams who were justifiably favored to beat them. Frank Sinatra's song, "New York, New York" played after the Giants had secured the Super Bowl win, but it also could have been "My Way," because the G-Men had won the title, and they had done it their way. Power football was what head coach Bill Parcells called it, and that it was. It was enough to earn them that second Super Bowl title, but again, just barely.  

The game was played in 1991, and was a bit overshadowed by the outbreak of war in Iraq under President George Bush (that would not be the only year where we could say that  little bit of news). 

Of course, I am a bit biased, being a fan of the New York Giants. That makes my memory of this a bit shinier than what it is for others, surely.

Yet, it was a fine Super Bowl.  Both teams brought their A-game into this one, and the game was remarkable for that reason. It was the first postseason game in NFL history where neither team had a turnover. Since then, this has been achieved a few other times.

But this game was a contrast in styles. The Giants were the defensive minded team, conservative and relatively quiet. They were the heavy underdogs among the relative elites heading into the season, but they pounded away, overcame injuries and, ultimately, perservered to get their shot. The week before this game, they ended the 49ers dynasty in San Francisco, on the very last play of the game. Ironically, they did it with a field goal in the final seconds to win it.

The Bills, by contrast, were the hot, flashy, cocky team. Most people at the start of the season predicted that they would win the AFC East, but not much else. They had been known as the Bickerin Bills, after all. They were not supposed to be as good as some of the other AFC contenders, particularly the Bengals, who were supposed to be the team. But the Bills caught fire with their no huddle offense, and a talented defense. They had people standing up and taking notice by midseason, and they just kept gettingf hotter and hotter. They plowed through Miami and the Raiders in the AFC playoffs, scoring an unbelievable 95 points in those two combined games. 

Buffalo crushed the Raiders, 51-3 in the AFC Championship Game, and headed into the Super Bowl as heavy favorites, and were cocky and acted the part. Some Bills were complaining that the Giants, and not San Francisco, had won the NFC title game, because the 49ers were more famous, and beating them would perhaps look and feel more legitimate. Another Bills player announced that he was getting his finger measured for a ring.

When the two teams finally took the field, they were both ready to go. It was the Bills new, fast, and sophisticated, high-powered offense versus the traditional, physical, smash mouth brand of football of the Giants. The high-flying Bills planned to ram Thurman Thomas down the Giants throats, and then to open up their deadly passing game. The Giants, in the meantime, had a smothering secondary, and on offense, they had a punishing, physical style featuring a solid running game of their own. What they did on that day was similar to what they had done against San Francisco: namely, to hang onto the ball and not put it in the hands of the dangerous offense. In Super Bowl XXV, the Giants would hold onto the ball for a Super Bowl record 40 minutes and 27 seconds (most people say it was 40 minutes and 23 seconds, although they forget the crucial final four seconds after Scott Norwood's field goal, when Jeff Hostetler knelt down to run out the clock).

It was an incredible Super Bowl. The Giants had the momentum early, driving the ball for a field goal and an early 3-0 lead. The Bills answered with a field goal of their own, and that was the first quarter. But in the second, Buffalo came alive with a touchdown drive for a 10-3 lead, and then got a safety for a 12-3 lead. But the Giants managed an impressive drive that culminated in a touchdown in the final minute of the first half, closing to within 12-10. They opened the second half with what was then the longest drive in Super Bowl history, filled with some highlight plays, particularly by wide receiver Mark Ingram and running back Ottis Anderson, and ending with an exclamation point touchdown that gave New York the 17-12 lead. Buffalo struck back all of a sudden with a long touchdown run by Thurman Thomas to make it 19-17 going into the final quarter. The Giants notched a field goal midway through the fourth, making it 20-19, and it came down to Buffalo's final drive. They got to within field goal position, and if it was good, of course, they would win.


We all know what happened then.

Norwood missed by two feet, and the rest is history. Parcells resigned shortly thereafter, and a few years later, he became the head coach of the New England Patriots. Later, he coached the New York Jets and the Dallas Cowboys. The Bills kept getting back to the big game, but never won it. They were dismantled by Washington completely the next year, and then after a fast start in the first half of Super Bowl XXVII, they completely fell apart and made mistake after mistake, committing a shocking nine turnovers and losing, 52-17. They played a little bit better the next time around against Dallas, but lost that fourth and final Super Bowl, too. They were very good, but they never did manage to win one. Yet, in this game, they came so unbelievably close!

What a game both teams played! And what a championship season for the Giants!

Here is my tribute to them, and to a great game, and probably the greatest week in the history of the New York Giants, a week which saw them defeat the 49ers in the NFC title game on one Sunday, and then eke out a victory against the Bills the next. I thought it would be good to add the blog entry that I wrote about it last year at around this time. It was called "Super Bowl XXV Memories" and was published on January 14, 2016:




Super Bowl XXV Memories               












Super Bowl XXV  – New York Giants 20, Buffalo Bills 19. Played on January 27, 1991 at Tampa Stadium in Tampa, Florida. Scott Norwood shank. MVP Ottis Anderson. Favorite Bills by 7. National anthem Whitney Houston. Halftime show New Kids on the Block. Attendance 73,813. Network ABC. Announcers Al Michaels, Frank Gifford, and Dan Dierdorf. Nielsen ratings 41.8. est. 79.51 million viewers. Market share 63. Cost of 30-second commercial US$800,000. Ottis Anderson 102 yards 1 TD.


Personal Memories: This is it! When I think of my very favorite Super Bowls, this one tops the list! For that matter, when I think of my favorite teams, and NFL memories that made me happiest growing up, the 1990-91 New York Giants were the team that tops that list. Entering this game, they had completed a 13-3 regular season record, and had entered the playoffs as the second seed in the NFC. And even though they wound up winning the Super Bowl in a very exciting fashion, this game does not even top my own personal favorite list from that season. That would belong to the game the Giants played the week before to get to the Super Bowl, when they knocked off the two-time defending Super Bowl champion 49ers in San Francisco.

Both teams had raced out to a 10-0 undefeated start, the first time that this had happened in a long time in the NFL, if not ever (it has since happened twice, in 2009 with the Saints and the Colts, who would meet in that season's Super Bowl, and then this season, with the Panthers and the Patriots). But at the time, two teams starting off so incredibly well and continuing this so late into the season was unheard of.

Everyone thought that the 49ers were the best team,and with good reason. They had won their fourth Super Bowl of the 1980's the prior season, and had won the title two years in a row. They still had that incredible dynasty lineup, with huge names like Montana, Rice, Craig, Haley, and Lott,among others. Think about it: Steve Young, who would soon take over quarterbacking responsiblities for the 49ers and become one of the most prolific passers of his era, had been a backup behind Montana for years, and he was easily good enough to be the starter for most teams. Yeah, they were that good.

So, they entered the season as the odds on favorites to achieve the historic "three peat", something that no NFL team had ever managed to do during the Super Bowl era. The Packers had won three NFL Championships in a row, and they had won the first two Super Bowls after winning the NFL Championship the year before, but that meant that they had not won three Super Bowls in a row.  San Francisco seemed on the verge of achieving exactly that, and everyone agreed that this would separate them from everyone else in history, and raise their status to greatest team of all time.

And there were the Giants, who had the gall to think that they could contend against such a team. They were set to meet in Week 12, and after both teams had remained undefeated at 10-0, it was a hugely anticipated match between what everyone presumed would be two unbeaten teams. Some were calling it the game of the century. Then, the week before the two teams would meet on Monday Night Football, they both lost to division rivals. The Giants lost at Philadelphia, 31-13, while San Francisco was downed by the Rams, 28-17.

So, it would be a meeting not of perfect teams, but of 10-1 teams. Still, it was one of the most watched Monday Night Football games ever, with everyone expecting it to be an offensive fireworks show.

It wasn't. In fact, the game would be the lowest scoring contest of the entire 1990 season. The Giants went up in the second quarter after getting a field goal, and the 49ers responded quickly with a touchdown, when Montana hit John Taylor. That made it 7-3, and that was it for the scoring. The Giants had some opportunities late in the game, but they opted to try and keep the drive alive, rather than going for a field goal to cut the lead to 7-6, and that cost them. On the final drive, instead of only needing a field goal to win it, they needed a touchdown, and they were not able to get it.

The Giants had lost two games in a row, and desperately needed a win. They got one against Minnesota, a team that themselves were struggling. But the next weekend, the Giants hosted the red-hot Buffalo Bills, who were emerging as the clear favorites in the AFC. This was taken as a major test for Buffalo, being from the AFC, and thus constantly questioned, as the AFC had lost the last six Super Bowls, and were seen as the weaker conference. But the Bills played hardball against the Giants, and defeated New York on a soggy December day, in a physical contest that helped legitimize them among football fans as a serious contender not just to make the Super Bowl, but possibly to win it. The game was costly for both teams, since the two starting quarterbacks both went down - first Phil Simms for the Giants (who was enjoying the finest season of his career and led the league among quarterbacks in overall statistics that season, and Jim Kelly for the Bills. Still, it was a triumph for Buffalo, cause for celebration. Indeed, when these two teams would meet in the Super Bowl, the Bills would officially be favored by one touchdown.

In the meantime, however, the Giants were reeling. They took the next two games on the road against weak teams, but won by a field goal margin against the Cardinals in the desert, and then the Patriots at Foxboro. The Patriots were the worst team in the league that year (a far cry from these days, isn't it?), and the Giants barely hung onto the game to finish at 13-3.

A lot of people expected the Giants to go one and done once in the playoffs, given the injury to Simms and the seeming end of the strong momentum that they had played with early in the season. Their first opponent happened to be the Chicago Bears, the third seed, and these two teams were a mirror image of one another. Tough, conservative, physical teams that had each won the Super Bowl years before. But the Giants used the versatility of their new starting quarterback, Jeff Hostetler, who used his athleticism and mobility to add a dangerous element to the Giants normally predictable offense. In the meantime, the defense shut down the Bears, and the combination was a surprisingly easy and convincing victory, as the Giants stomped on Chicago, 31-3.

The Giants and 49ers had been the two best teams in the NFC all season, and so it was fitting that they would meet in that year's NFC Championship Game. This game would prove to be intense and physical to an extreme. That is the reason that I count it as my very favorite NFL game right to this day. New York came in as heavy underdogs, as the 49ers were 8-point favorites. Everyone expected them to at least get back to the Super Bowl, and for many, the real question was whether or not they could beat the Bills, who again looked incredible in running through the AFC playoffs, easily dispatching with the Raiders in the AFC title game by a whopping 51-3 margin. They had a 38-point lead by halftime!

The 49ers were, again, the most accomplished team in the NFL at that point. They had won four titles, including the two prior ones. They owned the best record in the league in 1990, finishing at 14-2, and of course, the result as that they had home field advantage in that NFC title game. The names on that 49ers team are immortal, and include Joe Montana, Jerry Rice, Ronnie Lott, Charles Haley, Matt Millen, John Taylor, Roger Craig, and others. They were more than a formidable opponent. They were probably the biggest obstacle that any team could hurdle. The Giants clearly would have their work cut out for them.

Unlike in their earlier meeting during the regular season, the Giants would try to put points on the board at every opportunity, even if that meant sacrificing the touchdown for the field goal. They had lost by four points in the earlier meeting, and neglecting capitalizing on a field goal opportunity early in the final quarter had come back to haunt them in the final minute of the contest. So this time, the Giants relied on field goals. As it turned out, they scored field goals exclusively in this contest, and were unable to penetrate to get a touchdown. But the defense was tough, and kept the Giants in what proved to be another low scoring contest.

It was a bunch of field goals in the first half, but the 49ers faithful smelled blood when Montana once again hit John Taylor, who sprinted into the end zone, outrunning the pursuing Giant defenders. The score was now 13-6, and it seemed that San Francisco might be able to break the game open. But the New York defense kept strong, while the Giants offense kept plugging away, getting a field goal to bring it to 13-9.

However, the Giants defense (which was the best in the league that year) were not the only solid defense on the field that day. San Francisco had the second rated defense in the NFC, and they showed why on this day. New York kept struggling, but the 49ers held firm, forcing a punt in the final quarter, as they tried to cling to their 13-9 lead. That was when what may have been the turning point of the game occurred. Bill Parcells was known as a gambler, and he took a big chance here, calling a fake punt, and giving instead to Gary Reasons, who easily picked up enough for a first down to keep the drive alive. Not much later, the G-Men got another field goal to close to within a single point of the 49ers.

Still, San Francisco had a chance to clinch the win during the final minutes, as they were driving and trying to hang onto the ball and run the clock out on the Giants. What seemed like a huge first down from Steve Young to Bret Jones. Young was in because Montana had gotten knocked out of the game. In fact, he would never fully recover from the hit that Leonard Marshall delivered. Hostetler also took some hits, particularly one by former Giant defender Jim Burt, who hit his former teammate square on the knee. It looked like a serious injury, but Hostetler would return later in the contest. There were a lot of big hits in this game, but none had more of an impact on the outcome of the game than Erik Howard hitting Roger Craig right where he was holding the ball, popping it loose. Lawrence Taylor recovered, and the Giants were back in business. Up to that point, this game was flirting with becoming the first postseason NFL game in history without a turnover, a sign of how well both teams were playing.

The Giants made that last drive count, marching down to get into field goal position, hoping to win the game on the final play. Indeed, that is what happened, as they lined up for a 40-yard field goal, which placekicker Matt Bahr hit through the uprights, sending the Giants to Tampa and Super Bowl XXV. It was his fifth field goal of the game, but the most memorable and important kick, perhaps of his career. If not, it surely would be the next week, in the final quarter of the Super Bowl.

Super Bowl XXV was a contrast in styles. The Bills had the flashy, high-powered offense, while the Giants had the smashmouth approach that focused on solid defense and a running game that wore out opponents and killed the clock. While the NFC Championship Game between the Giants and 49ers had almost been the first playoff game without a turnover, this one would achieve the feat, which was just one of many indicators of just how well played this game was by both sides.

The Giants drew first blood, scoring a field goal early, but Buffalo answered quickly with a field goal of their own. The first quarter ended in that 3-3 tie. But in the second quarter, the Bills would start taking control of the game, pounding it into the end zone for a 10-3 lead after a rare Giants defensive miscue. Not much later, Jeff Hostetler was caught in his own end zone by Bills defender Bruce Smith for a safety, giving Buffalo a commanding 12-3 lead, and all of the momentum. It seemed like a bad omen, although in fact, Hostetler might have saved the game for New York, as he tucked in the ball safely into his chest, preventing a catastrophic fumble that could have been recovered by Buffalo and given them a much bigger lead.

Still, the Giants were in trouble, and needed something quickly, before halftime. They got it in the final drive, going down the field and putting themselves in scoring position. But they really needed a touchdown, rather than settling for a field goal. This the Giants managed to achieve when Hostetler threw a perfect spiral into the hands of receiver Stephen Baker in the corner of the end zone for a touchdown with seconds left in the second quarter, cutting the Buffalo lead to 12-10 just before the two teams returned to the locker rooms for halftime. it was a huge and critical swing in momentum that Bills coach Marv Levy mentioned in the post-game interview as particularly brutal for them.

When play resumed in the second half, the Giants got the ball first, and used their trademark physicality to wear the Bills defenders down. They orchestrated what was then the longest drive in Super Bowl history, taking the better part of ten minutes off of the clock, keeping a tired Buffalo defense on the field, and a dangerous Buffalo offense off the field. The Bills offense had not taken the field in the better part of an hour, between the Giants final drive of the first half and their first drive of the second half, coupled with the halftime break. It was a way to keep them a little cold, given how hot they had been all season. And perhaps the crucial play had come when the Giants faced a 3rd down and 13, when wide receiver Stephen Ingram caught a Hostetler pass and then twisted and turned through several Bills defenders, ultimately hopping on one leg with defenders clinging to him and trying to drag him down, but not before he picked up a crucial first down. It was that play that perhaps best embodied New York's fighting spirit in that contest.

Buffalo was a championship caliber team this year, however, and they were bound to answer. They did so when Thurman Thomas, their star running back, broke free for a long touchdown run, giving the Bills a 19-17 lead in the fourth quarter.

The game went back and forth between struggling offenses after that, but the Giants once again got into scoring position late in the game. Buffalo's defense held firm and prevented a touchdown, but Matt Bahr was able to get the field goal that gave the Giants a 20-19 lead very late in the game.

Ultimately this game came down to the final Bills drive. With roughly two minutes to go and a long way to move the ball, Buffalo managed to orchestrate a solid drive themselves, finally converting on third down (they had uncharacteristically failed to convert a single third down during the entire game to that point). Bills tight end Keith McKeller made what was a brilliant catch, and the Bills were in field goal position as the clock wound down.

Of course, it came down to that famous field goal attempt by Scott Norwood, and almost everyone knows that story now. He hooked it just slightly wide right, but it was enough to secure the victory for the Giants. Buffalo had played extremely well, but had fallen just short.

The New York Giants had captured their second Super Bowl title in five seasons, albeit by the slimmest of margins. They had established a new Super Bowl record for longest time of possession, with 40:37 seconds (including those final four seconds of the game, after the fateful field goal attempt). The team would be different henceforth. Parcells would leave the team. Mark Bavaro would no longer play for the team. Hostetler would be named the starting quarterback. And the Giants would fail to be a winning team in either of the next couple of seasons. But all of that came to fruition only after the Giants had won another glorious championship, made all the better because it was relatively unexpected! They had overcome enormous odds - losing their starting quarterback, losing home field advantage to the dynasty 49ers, then beating those same heavily favored 49ers in the NFC Championship Game, and finally overcoming a very powerful, and also heavily favored Buffalo Bills team that came closer than any other losing Super Bowl team before or since, in order to win that highly memorable championship - a championship that endures and continues to define the New York Football Giants.


Personal Memories: Junior in high school, the NFC Championship Game that got the Giants to the Super Bowl was my favorite NFL game of all time, and I leaped into the air when the Bahr field goal on the last play of the game won it for the Giants, much to the amusement of my parents, who laughed. The Super Bowl was no less intense, and I again jumped and celebrated when they won. My brother and I kicked field goals on the snowy high school football field earlier in the day.




Here are some of the major events that took place in 1991, the year this Super Bowl was played. The world's population was 5.359 billion people. Economic sanctions were lifted on South Africa, as the reforms from the segregation of apartheid continued. The Gulf War was fought, and within weeks, Iraq surrendered and pulled out of Kuwait. The communist government of Albania resigned. The Warsaw Pact was dissolved. Haitian troops captured the President of Haiti, the United States suspended support of Haiti. France agrees to a 1968 agreement banning the spread of atomic weapons. China accepted the nuclear nonproliferation treaty, and Gorbachev met with Bush for arms reductions. Lithuania, Estonia, and Latvia declare independence from the Soviet Union. Boris Yeltsin became the first freely elected President of Russia. The Soviet Union dissolved at the end of the year.



http://boards.sportslogos.net/topic/98529-super-bowl-field-database-sb-xlvi-texture-added-122215/page-9








Super Bowl XXV 25 Years Later: A Giants Fan Reflects on Norwood's Missed Fieldgoal
(originally published on January 27, 2016)









Okay, I will admit it. As a Giants fan, I threw my arms up and jumped in celebration when Scott Norwood's kick sailed just wide, securing the back and forth contest in favor of the Giants. Game, set, match, and championship to the Giants.

At the time, it was all that I wanted, all that I could think of as a fan of the Giants for my entire life.

At the time, in fact, I recorded the game and would watch that historical moment, as well as the postgame interviews. And yes, a smile emerged on my face when Norwood's interview came up, and it was a mean-spirited smile that I am not proud of.

It's no excuse, but I was just a dumb, sixteen year old kid who was a little too happy that my favorite team won the Super Bowl. In retrospect, I can admit that, in large part, it was because not much else was going on in my life. I was a miserable high school student without a rich social life, and without a girlfriend. So, the 1990 football season, which was admittedly an unusually intense and entertaining one (at least for fans of the Giants, Bills, and 49ers), took on an unusual degree of importance in my life at the time. In the weeks that followed, I probably watched that game three or four times, and still got a bit nervous each time Norwood lined up to take the field goal, as if this time, he was destined to make it.

But he will always be remembered for missing that kick of a lifetime.

I grew up. Finally did some things to make my life more interesting. The Giants became less interesting as a result, although perhaps this was made easier by the fact that they were nowhere near as good as they had been. No longer was I religiously in front of the television, watching football games on Sundays. I still follow it, and sometimes catch parts of games, and always watch the playoffs and Super Bowl. But no longer am I what you would call a devoted fan glued to my television set whenever the Giants appear.

Yet, the memories still resonate for me. I still think of that game, that kick, and how much it meant to me. How happy it made me. Admittedly, I kind of look at that with some measure of distaste now, because I know that it should not have made me as happy as it ultimately did. In particular, I think back to how I was trying hard not to laugh during Norwood's postgame interview, because I knew that was wrong (even though no one was there to watch me).

The thing is, he seems like a decent guy. I really had nothing against him, and realize that it could just as easily have sailed through, and he would be remembered forever as the hero.

I think the reason that my reaction was so negative, despite my team having won in glorious, memorable, and exciting fashion that postseason not once, but twice, is that it was so close. The Giants could easily have lost that game. Hell, they could easily have lost the NFC Championship Game, for that matter. But they barely pulled off both games, and won an unlikely championship.

Yes, I said it. It was an unlikely championship because, admittedly, the Giants were probably not the best team in the league that season. The Bills were. It took me a long time to come to terms with that. But there came a point, as an adult, when I will admit that I felt at that time, and still feel now (yes, despite New York's victory in the big game) that Buffalo had the better football team that season.

Their offense was incredible and in sync. Their defense was loaded with talent, and disciplined. They caught fire at some point that season and, yes, they looked like the team of destiny. I do not know this for sure, but my suspicions are that they would have beaten the 49ers had San Francisco been in that Super Bowl. They almost beat the Giants instead.

Almost, but not quite. The Giants brought their A-game, and played a very physical (some might suggest boring, if they are not fans) style that wore the Bills out. Remember, that was a Buffalo team that had put up 44 points against Miami and tore the Raiders up 51-3 in the AFC Championship Game. The Giants had to keep that offense off the field, and they did, keeping possession of the ball for over 40 minutes, which still remains a Super Bowl record.

Still, they scraped by for the win. Had the time of possession been a bit more even, the Bills would have won. Hell, if there had not been a miracle play with Ingram's third and 13 conversion, breaking several tackles along the way, Buffalo likely would have won. If Hostetler had not tucked the ball in on the Buffalo safety, which could have been a touchdown, the Bills win. If Lofton takes that long bomb in for the TD, the Bills win. And even after all of that, even after less than 20 minutes of possession time total (at one point, the Bills offense had barely touched the ball for roughly one hour in real time), the Bills could have won with a field goal. Had it been a little closer, they likely would have won. had it been a bit longer, according to Frank Reich (the backup QB and placekicker on the play for the Bills), the kick likely would have gone through, and the Bills would have won.

Instead, the kick sailed wide right, by about two feet.

It was a moment in time that would live on for me for quite some time, but there was something that felt wrong about it.

Ironically, the moment that I remember best from that championship season was the week before, when the Giants, wearing my favorite road white jerseys, beat the "Team of the Decade" 49ers in San Francisco, because Matt Bahr managed to kick the field goal through the uprights to win the game, in a situation very similar to the one that Norwood would be in the next week. It felt right because that kick won it for the Giants, while Norwood's miss lost it for the Bills. To that point, despite all of the things that went wrong for them in that game, they still were dictating play and in a position to earn the win.

Instead, the kick sailed wide right, by about two feet.

In time, that mean-spirited joy over someone else's pain withered, and I thought about Norwood himself from time to time. I was pulling for the Bills the next few years, when they returned to the Super Bowl, and was disheartened when they lost. I remember pulling for Scott Norwood in particular in 1991, and wondering where he was after the 1991 season ended. Buffalo had a new placekicker for 1992, and no one picked up Norwood otherwise.

I felt bad, but life goes on.

Then, I met some Bills fans, and they spoke about that Super Bowl, and how much they hated my Giants. Some suggested that the Bills were the better team, and when I thought about it, found myself  actually agreeing. Remember, the Bills had beaten the Giants at the Meadowlands only about one month and change before the two teams would meet in Tampa for Super Bowl XXV.

Had that been the first meeting between the two teams that season (in other words, had that been Super Bowl XXV), then Buffalo would likely have won that Super Bowl.

Instead, the kick sailed wide right, by about two feet.

At the time, I could not have been more thrilled.

As the years went by, I began to think a little bit differently about it. When I met those Bills fans, and when I went to the city of Buffalo, I thought more deeply about it. Every now and then, I looked up Scott Norwood online, to see what was going on in his life now, where he was all of these years later.

Buffalo is a relatively nice city. It has character, and there are certainly nice parts of the city. I love the cities right along a big body of water, like one of the Great Lakes, and Buffalo has that, obviously. It also is in close proximity to Niagara Falls, and has some wonderful countryside in the surrounding area that provides pristine rural, pastoral scenes.

Plus, Buffalo has an interesting architectural history that a former girlfriend of mine awoke me to. She took me to the old rail line terminal, and pointed out some buildings of historical and architectural interests during a visit to the city, and she even contemplated a move up to Buffalo.

Unfortunately, Buffalo is too often overlooked. Niagara Falls is nearby, but it is not Buffalo itself. The city is pretty big, yet more overlooked in New York State (and for reasons that should be obvious) than similar cities are in other states, such as Pittsburgh, Cleveland, and Cincinnati. And, of course, in terms of sports, this is the city that seems to come close to winning championships, but never quite gets there. The Sabres have gone to the Stanley Cup Finals twice, but failed to win. And the Bills went to those four straight Super Bowls, which really is a remarkable feat that sets this franchise apart. Yet, all that people harp on is that they lost them all.

The Buffalo Bills were robbed of their stature of greatness by those four losses. From 1988 until 1993, the Bills were right next to being the winningest team in the NFL. They went 12-4 in 1988, 9-7 in 1989, 13-3 in 1990, 13-3 in 1991, 11-5 in 1992, and 12-4 in 1993. Put that all together, and they enjoyed a 70-26 mark. That is second next to San Francisco's 72-24 mark during that time, but the Bills had 10 postseason wins to add to that, while the 49ers had nine. Both won five division titles during that stretch, but the Bills made it to the playoffs in each of those years, which San Francisco cannot claim. The Niners won two Super Bowls, however, while the Bills won none. But Buffalo came within a few feet of seeing that field goal attempt go through the uprights, and who knows how things would have turned out differently then? The Bills of the early 90's deserve to be recognized as one of the most successful teams. Four straight Super Bowls, and do not forget about the greatest come back in NFL history!

Yet, all that people remember is that the Bills lost those four Super Bowls, like the Broncos and Vikings had at that time before them (Denver has since won two Super Bowls). It is most unfortunate that such a great Bills team should be remembered in such a negative, pessimistic way.



Buffalo, NY

Photo courtesy of JasonParis - Buffalo, NY: https://www.flickr.com/photos/jasonparis/3579975929

Creative Commons License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

One Bills fan that I met (a particularly immature one for someone over thirty years old, I might add) said that if Norwood walked through the door at any given moment, he would punch him right in the face. I reject such a stupid and unforgiving sentiment.

Ridiculous.

As I already mentioned, the guy seems like a really decent guy. Here is a clip from a few years ago showing Norwood receiving some official distinction for his charity work behind the scenes: