Sunday, February 6, 2022

New York Football Giants Charged With Allegations of Racism

 


New York Giants


As a Giants fan, I can attest to the fact that this past season was one of the most dismal in recent memory. 

Why?              

Because the Giants were terrible….again. They were one of the worst teams in the league and had both one of the worst overall records, as well as among the very worst endings to the season of any team…again.       

Yes, again is the operative word there. If it were one season, it might feel bad, but there would be plenty of hope for the future. I remember feeling annoyed when the Giants completed bombed in 1987, the season after they won their first Super Bowl. But there was a sense that this was a fluke, and that they would be back among the elites soon enough. The 1992 season felt similarly dismal as a fan of the G-Men, because they had gone from Super Bowl champions to mind-numbing mediocrity as quickly as any team had to that point, and it was not obvious that their fortunes ere going to change. However, at least the bulk of their lineup had enjoyed success at the highest level, giving the team and it’s fans (like me) a Super Bowl championship just two seasons earlier.              

But this season has just been awful. Not only are they among the very worst teams in the league, with question marks all over the place, from quarterback to offensive line to running back to defense and coaching and even management, but they have been among the worst teams now for five straight seasons. Yes, that’s right. The last time that Big Blue qualified for the postseason was following the 2016 season.      

So things look and feel quite bleak at the moment.              

The last thing that they need would be a controversy. Yet, that is exactly what happened in recent days, and the story has gotten big enough that it already is transcending mere sports pages, and making wider news.     

What happened?              

Well, former Miami Dolphins Head coach is alleging racism is what prevented him from obtaining the Head coaching position for the New York Football Giants. If I understand the situation correctly, he had gone on an interview after hearing from Belichick that the vacancy had already been filled.              

Not sure what will happen in this case. Time will tell, although this story has already obviously generated considerable controversy and publicity. Not exactly the kind of headlines or being at the center of debate that the Giants or their fans would want, for that matter.

Of course, Giants management had a different take. A statement was released which clarified their official position on the matter:

“We are pleased and confident with the process that resulted in the hiring of Brian Daboll. We interviewed an impressive and diverse group of candidates. The fact of the matter is, Brian Flores was in the conversation to be our head coach until the eleventh hour. Ultimately, we hired the individual we felt was most qualified to be our next head coach.” 

During Wednesday’s edition of First Take, noted host and sports pundit Stephen A. Smith was very critical of the Giants organization in this matter. This is what he said:

“Let me say this to the New York Giants. As an organization, when it comes to black coaches, I don’t believe a damn word you have to say. There’s no one more incriminating than the New York Giants when it comes to black coaches. We are in the year 2022. All of these years, damn near a century for crying out loud, there is one single franchise that has not had a black coach. That is the New York Giants.”   

Just for the record, in fact, according to a recent MSN article (see link below) where this issue is explored a bit, and from where I took many of the quote in this particular blog entry, there "are six teams that have never hired a Black general manager or head coach on a full-time basis. Although the Giants did have a Black GM — Jerry Reese — they have never had a full-time Black head coach in their history."

Still, Smith's larger point is well-taken. As a Giants fan myself, I cannot help but wonder why the organization never hired a black head coach, which by now puts them in a very small minority of franchises that hold that dubious distinction. Not sure that I would go so far as to suggest that it is systemic racism within the organization at this point, although I also would suggest that the possibility cannot be easily dismissed, given the facts in this case. 

Nor is Smith the only one who is taking this story on and suggesting that, yes, this is proof that racism is at work here. Former NBA great Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was also very critical, suggesting that the NFL is reflective of the wider United States in this regard. While he suggested that this was not necessarily the product of blatantly racist attitudes, he does believe that is on a deeper, less obvious level which, again, he suggests is a lot like the country itself:

"Brian Flores is suing the National Football League and the only question I have is “What took so long?” I’m not referring specifically to Flores’ lawsuit, but to making public the racism inherent in the NFL like a vestigial limb.  

(...) The alabaster ceiling stifles Black ambition and sends a clear message that “your kind” aren’t good enough. Let’s look at the numbers. Despite nearly 60 percent of the NFL players being Black, at the beginning of the 2021 season only three of the 32 head coaches were Black: Pittsburgh Steelers’ Mike Tomlin, Houston Texans’ David Culley and Miami Dolphins’ Brian Flores. At the end of the season, Culley and Flores have been fired leaving only Tomlin as the single Black head coach.

We like to think of sports as the embodiment of America’s best intentions: a level playing field in which merit is the only standard of judgement. As goes sports, so goes America. Unfortunately, the NFL is an $8.78 billion industry and the people who control the money prefer the people who run their business to look more like them. In many cases, it’s probably not even conscious racism, just an unconscious comfort level based on what’s familiar. Mashed potatoes over chitlins. As goes sports, so goes America."

Now, the Giants did have some defenders. Tiki Barber, the former Giants star running back who played for the team in Super Bowl XXXV, took exception to the notion that the management of the franchise is at all racist. In fact, he defended them when the debate came up on his show, Tiki & Tierney on Wednesday:

“I just don’t think that the Maras, who I’ve known for 25 years, are racist,” Barber said, via Big Blue View.

As for NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, he released a rather long-winded statement that reiterated the league's official stance against racism. He praised the league's efforts to be more all-inclusive, although he also was careful to be measured and suggested that the issue was far from resolved. The full statement was, frankly, a bit long, so I just incorporated his concluding point:

"There is much work to do, and we will embrace this moment and seize the opportunity to become a stronger, more inclusive league."

So, what do you guys think? Is this indeed reflective of racist attitude, unconscious or conscious? Or are these charges overblown? Did the Giants truly hire the man who they simply believed was the better option and who would give them the better chance of winning and/or was a better fit for the direction that the organization is trying to go in? Or was this perhaps just one more example of the franchise choosing someone because of skin color?

It will be interesting to see how this story shapes up. And while I obviously wish both Flores and new Giants head coach Brian Daboll well, it will be interesting to see, when the time comes, how much pressure will be on the organization to hire a black head coach the next time around, whenever that issue arises. 





Below are links to the two articles - both from MSN - from which I took the quotes used above, and used much of the specific information that was used, as well. Please take a look if you would like to examine this issue a little more closely:


Kareem Abdul-Jabbar has a blunt take on Brian Flores' suing the NFL by Ernesto Cova, February 5, 2022:  

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/kareem-abdul-jabbar-has-a-blunt-take-on-brian-flores-suing-the-nfl/ar-AATtsma?ocid=entnewsntp


Emotional Tiki Barber comes to defense of Giants, owners: They aren't racist by Dan Benton, February 2, 2022:  

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/emotional-tiki-barber-comes-to-defense-of-giants-owners-they-aren-t-racist/ar-AATpJsV?ocid=entnewsntp



Finally, the quote by Commissioner Goodell was taken from the following source:

Yahoo Sports Roger Goodell sends memo addressing Brian Flores lawsuit: 'There is much work to do' Chris Cwik Chris Cwik Sat, February 5, 2022:

https://sports.yahoo.com/roger-goodell-sends-memo-addressing-brian-flores-lawsuit-there-is-much-work-to-do-162144805.html

Saturday, February 5, 2022

The Era of Ben Roethlisberger in the NFL & the Death of the Joy of Sports

When I was a child, I began to get into NFL football. It was 1981, and that turned out to be quite a spectacular season and postseason in the NFL, and set up what felt like a lifelong interest as a fan. The games and story lines and teams were interesting.              

One aspect of the NFL that always intrigued me, perhaps because I had just missed it, were the Pittsburgh Steelers. In particular, it was fascinating that the Steelers had won four Super Bowls in a span of six seasons. That is a level of success that had not been seen before or since, at least not in the Super Bowl era. They had a certain mystique about them, coming as they did from a blue collar town. They were a tough, physical team that did not rely on fancy schemes or tricks, and thus seemed to reflect this tough, blue collar identity of the city that they represented and played for.              

So part of my being a fan was this fascination with the Steelers, who were never my favorite team, or really even close to it. Yet, a part of me wanted to see them enjoy success, and get back to the Super Bowl. They finally did in the 1995-96 season, and it was a dream match-up (at least for me) against the Cowboys. These two teams had been a contrast in style and image back in the seventies, as the two most successful franchises of that decade. They were the first teams to have a rematch in the Super Bowl, and their meeting in Super Bowl XXX made them the first (and so far only) two franchises to meet in three Super Bowls. It was especially intriguing when the Steelers, who were heavy underdogs, not only made a game of it, but seemed to be driving for potentially the winning score late in the fourth quarter. They had won both of the previous Super Bowls by four points each, and doing 20-17, a touchdown would put them up by four, and possibly secure another victory by that same margin. But they did not score that touchdown, and would lose their first ever Super Bowl as a franchise that year.    

About a decade later, they obtained a rookie quarterback who seemed to really have talent. He led Pittsburgh to an incredibly 15-1 regular season, winning their finally 14 straight regular season games, and went to the AFC Championship Game, where they lost to the eventual champions, the New England Patriots. The next season, the Steelers finished 11-5, but went on a tear in the playoffs, reaching the Super Bowl for only the second time since I became a fan. I liked the Seahawks as a franchise, but cannot deny that the draw of finally seeing the Steelers win a Super Bowl proved too much. It was a horrible game, perhaps the most boring Super Bowl that I had ever seen to that point.      

The young quarterback who led the offense was, of course, Ben Roethlisberger. He had a difficult name to remember and spell. But his play was stellar. Now, he had led this storied franchise to a fifth overall Super Bowl title, restoring the pride and greatness to a franchise and city that had not won a Super Bowl in over a quarter of a century.              

When I got to know a little bit more about him, however, it seemed like there was less and less to like. This is not to detract from his football abilities, which to me remain unquestioned. Ultimately, he led the Steelers to three Super Bowl appearances, and won two of them. You don’t do that by being a chump.              

On a personal level, however, he seemed…well, not especially likable, frankly. I remember an early interview with him, where he was laughing and saying that he needed to get used to being whistled at by women. It seemed at the time to be rather arrogant. Given what happened years later, it was almost haunting.              

The next thing that struck me as odd followed his first Super Bowl win. He got into a serious motorcycle accident when he was not wearing a helmet. Of course, that is his right, but it still seemed rather irresponsible.

Here's the thing: sports is at it's best, in my opinion, when it reflects the very best that humanity has to offer. For example, the Olympic Games were originally from Ancient Greece, and supposed to showcase the very best athletic accomplishments from the most gifted athletes, aspiring to almost the most divine among us, at least in terms of physical ability. When you marvel at the remarkable athleticism on display in the modern Olympics, or in modern sports - which of course includes North American leagues in team sports - it should transport you to another place, almost, and let you wonder and dream of what we individually can accomplish at our very best. As a fan of the NFL when I was a kid, there are still some plays and game situations that I remember and marvel at. Those memories include Joe Montana seemingly throwing that ball out of reach, then Dwight Clark making the impossible reach to grab the ball for the winning touchdown in "The Catch." It was Mark Bavaro dragging four or so 49ers defenders and struggling for some crucial extra yardage, helping to spark a remarkable Giants comeback, down 17-0 at the time. It was John Elway calmly leading his Broncos on a 98-yard drive for a tying touchdown in the 1986 AFC Championship Game to force overtime, then winning it shortly thereafter. It was Doug Williams proving many skeptics wrong and defying those who doubted that a black quarterback could win a Super Bowl as he threw four touchdown passes in the second quarter, and Washington overcoming a 10-0 first quarter deficit against the favored Denver Broncos and ultimately cruising to a 42-10 win. It was Montana again, this time to Rice, who made a remarkably athletic stretch to just get the ball inside of the pylons for a tying touchdown in Super Bowl XXIII, and then later in the same game, Montana finding John Taylor for the winning touchdown. It was the Buffalo Bills overcoming a 32-point deficit and finding a way, improbably, to come all the way back and ultimately to win the game against the Houston Oilers. 

Yes, those were among my favorite memories of all time during the time when I was a huge fan of the NFL. Times when I was able to lose myself in the drama of a game, at least for a few hours. And here's the thing: in most of those instances, I was not even a fan of the team that won. My favorite team was always the New York Giants, and my second favorite team the Jets. Certainly, I was not a 49ers fan, although I always liked and very much respected Joe Montana, Jerry Rice, and the seemingly sagely, wise Bill Walsh. I was pulling against Elway's Broncos most of the time back then. And so on. But there were some instances when fans like me could simply get mixed up into the drama, and marvel at the athletes and circumstances during a game, even if our teams were not doing particularly well, or perhaps were not even involved. For example, one memory that I did not include, but which I also would include as the magic of the NFL back then, was from the 1988 season, when Phil Simms led the Giants to what seemed like a comeback victory, scoring a touchdown down 13-10 late in the fourth quarter for what appeared to be the winning score. But then Joe Montana found Jerry Rice deep, as two Giants defenders collided into each other, leaving Rice open and alone for a surprisingly easy and graceful winning long bomb touchdown to stun the crowd at the Meadowlands. It was heartbreaking, yet also a part of the magic of sports back then. Yet, I still remember it fondly, despite my team being on the wrong end of a magical moment, because it was a perfect illustration of the drama of sports. 

But you know what? Those kinds of instances have become rare for me these days. It is perhaps ironic, because on some level, I would have loved all of the 24/7 coverage of sports back then, the way that they have it now. Hell, as a teenager, specifically, I remember enjoying being able to watch ESPN, especially on Sunday evenings, when I could watch all of the highlights from that week in the NFL with Chris Berman and NFL Primetime. It sure felt like they captured the drama of each team, and what they were going through, what they hoped to achieve. There was plenty enough drama. 

Yet these days, people often claim that the NFL, and almost all of those major North American sports leagues, have lost something. Recently, I ran into a post on Facebook that was telling for me. It showed popular, opinionated sports show personality Stephen A. Smith making a bored face, and then suggesting something like "Me When I Watch an NFL Game Not Involving My Fantasy League Team." That sounds about right, too. I have met people who hardly seem interested in football in the conventional sense at all. They are more interested in their Fantasy Leagues, and how much money they might win. Fantasy Football immeasurably detracts from the notion that football is a team sport, instead focusing on individual player statistics and such. For the most part, it is gambling and, like gambling, most of the people who feel that they have a "formula" and earned whatever success they had are often simply fooling themselves. 

I do know some people who still mostly enjoy following certain teams. That includes a guy who is still into his team, the Dallas Cowboys. Yet, even this seems narrow-minded and self-interested, because he at least claims to lose interest in football when his Cowboys are not involved. So following that logic, he only likes football when it involves his team, and only when they win, at that. Otherwise, he at least claims not to have any interest in it.

How boring. 

Because that is what sports has become for so many. An exclusively self-interested thing where people can win money and get a frankly largely undeserved sense of accomplishment by winning in gambling. 

So where does Ben Roethlisberger fit into all of this?

Well, to me, he became the main symbol of an era when sports in general, and football in particular, started to feel a whole lot less fun and innocent. 

As almost every football fan knows, Roethlisberger was charged with a serious crime. It never went to trial, because he settled outside of court first. But the fact that the allegations were credible enough that it was going to go to trial, and that he had to settle outside of court, felt almost like a kind of admission of guilt, at least to me. Then, when he again found himself facing very similar charges maybe one year later, most of the world began to look at this man as truly despicable. 

Somehow, all of this was forgotten, simply swept under the rug. Both times, Roethlisberger got what feels like a slap in the wrist compared to what he could have, and probably should have faced. He remained an active quarterback making millions of dollars to play a game on Sundays in autumn. Before long, the sports shows began to refer to him once again as "Big Ben," rather affectionately. It was sickening to see all of the love and praise he received recently in those broadcasts of his games, especially the playoff game against the Chiefs. Almost like those charges - and remember, these were very serious charges of what amounted to rape - were not even glossed over, but outright swept under the rug. Here they were, praising his character, his competitiveness, his toughness. He was described as a family man, and there were even adoring fans (including some young women) holding posters with his face prominently on them.

Sickening.

Now, it could be argued that he was merely a young man who made mistakes, and probably - hopefully - learned better since. But this is a double-standard, because many of these same people who would make this argument would be a whole lot less forgiving of a young woman who was found to have made false allegations of rape against a famous man. Also, it makes you wonder why other famous athletes paid a much higher price in similar circumstances, such as Mike Tyson and Michael Vick, which I will get into later. 

First of all, it is hard for me not to view him as a criminal. Because frankly, the evidence sure seemed to be there that "Big Ben" forced himself on a woman. Given those comments he gave in that old interview, the one about the need to get used to being whistled at by women, it felt like his rationalizing to the woman, his apparent victim, that a lot of women would be thrilled to have sex with the star quarterback of the Pittsburgh Steelers feels consistent. Maybe I am being overly idealistic here, but if I were him, it feels like it would be necessary to do anything and everything possible to prove myself innocent of these charges, if I actually was innocent. The only reason that I would settle out of course is if, indeed, I was guilty of those charges. 

And of course, when he settled out of court, and then again got in trouble for the same thing about a year later, it began to feel like too much of a pattern, and too much to dismiss it as mere coincidence. The star quarterback of the Pittsburgh Steelers, indeed. It was hard not to compare him to Michael Vick, who was also a star quarterback who engaged in not merely despicable, but outright criminal, behavior. But at least Vick was sent to jail, and did hard time. Yes, he came back to the NFL and got a six figure salary before too long. Like with Roethlisberger, I could not stand Vick, and actively rooted against him. Yet the parallels between the two quarterbacks raised an interesting, and rather obvious, question: why did one get off so comparatively lightly, while the other actually went to jail? In America today, you can never dismiss race as an obvious possibility for the differences in how each of these two men saw their cases handled. 

Another comparison could be made with Mike Tyson. After all, Tyson was still the most famous, preeminent boxer in the world at the time that he was charged with rape. He lost years, presumably some of his best years, and presumably also lot a ton of money along with those lost years. Roethlisberger, like Tyson, was also at the pinnacle of his success, having won two Super Bowl titles in recent seasons. Unlike Tyson, he did not get sent to prison, and while e lost some millions (at least that much), he still obviously made many millions of dollars when he very well could have - and frankly probably should have - spent that period doing hard time instead. Again, you have to ask why one got one outcome, and the other got a much different one. And whether or not people like to admit it, race is not something that you can easily dismiss as perhaps the root of why one seemed to get away with it, and the other...well, not so much.

Yet another example could be Ray Rice. I remember rooting for Rice when he was a star running back at Rutgers. A part of me was very happy for him when he won a Super Bowl with the Baltimore Ravens. But any admiration for the man went away immediately once it was revealed how much of a monster he is. Had the Ravens done what the Steelers did with Roethlisberger, and kept Rice on no matter what, and tried to sweep this whole thing under the rug, they would have become a team that I would hope to see lose on a weekly basis. Surely, it hurt the team in terms of talent when they let him go. But to their credit, they let him go. Perhaps it is because of the video that was made public, and which put the league - which if memory serves correctly, initially tried to sweep the incident under the rug before the video was made public - that there was greater pressure, and the league and the Ravens both felt that they had no choice. Perhaps if some kind of video proof of Roethlisberger's misdeeds had become public, as happened in the case of Rice, the Steelers and the league both would have been forced to let him go and face the full legal ramifications for his actions. Instead, in the absence of video proof, they went the other way. Frankly, all that over the top hype about what a great quarterback and a stand-up, family type of guy he really is smacks of an obvious attempt to cover up the controversy. Because Roethlisberger is an ugly blight on the league, and my suspicion is that most fans of the league, and most of the so-called pundits and sports guys who make their living covering the NFL, know it all too well. They just lack either the honesty or integrity to admit it. 

You know, I will say that I still enjoy sports, and even NFL football. Obviously, it has been covered here plenty of times, so that fact should be obvious enough. There is something about the statistics that really piques my interest. Also, it does still take me back a bit to my childhood, and the magic that I felt when younger regarding sports.

However, like with almost everything else that shined brighter and tasted sweeter during younger years, sports also seems to be different, and much less enjoyable these days. They are not quite as welcome a distraction as they used to be. Indeed, I follow sports, mostly the NFL, the NBA, the NHL, tennis, soccer (especially World Cup, but also the French Ligue 1) and some other sports, including the Olympics. But it seems to have all changed over the years. There used to be a reason to root for a team. When I was a kid, the Giants had a certain blue collar style and identity, at least relative to other teams in the league. They had a conservative, physical, hard-working approach, which I came to appreciate and, even to some extent, to identify with. That helped to make their victories feel a bit like my victories at the time.

Something feels very different these days. There is more player turnover, which means not only less loyalty by players to teams, but also more news about contract negotiations and the money involved, which exposes the suddenly transparent greed on both sides. It all seems to be about money and individual accomplishment, and the Fantasy Football leagues also seem to reinforce this, especially from the vantage point of fans. It feels like it is less about teams, and more about individuals, and this is not a change for the better.

Yes, sports feels much different these days. But it feels that way not just because I am older, and some of the old magic is gone. I used to have the ability to get completely into the game and lose myself, so that the world and all of it's problems seemed almost to disappear for a few hours. But that is gone. It is more difficult than ever to lose myself completely in a game, because there is so much more talk about individuals, and not teams. And since there is the constant reminder that these players are performing for their next contract negotiations, and that they might not be on this team any longer if they can make more money elsewhere, it feels more difficult to root for them, and for the team. Also, players feel more spoiled and full of themselves than ever before, and seem to where this false sense of entitlement on their sleeves more than they ever used to do. Players do dances and celebrate after almost literally any good play made, and this too grows tiresome. Again, it is all about "me," and not so much about "we." Just a sign of the times.

Indeed, sports feels more like a sign of the times. Even with sports, which used to be a diversion, an escape, there is the reflection of the ugliest aspects of this world. And for me, nobody in the NFL seems to reflect that quite as much as Ben Roethlisberger. 

Now he is gone, his NFL career (most likely) done. Far from heaping praise on him, I am glad that he is gone, at least. He more than anyone else in the league symbolized that stereotype of the big, dumb jock getting away with horrible behavior and being a generally awful human being, just because he has some real athletic talent. It was not that he became a suitable villain, somebody I enjoyed seeing lose, although I was obviously happier when he did. No, it is more like I found him (and by extension, his team, since they went to such lengths to protect him) sickening, and did not want, much less need, any reminders that he was still playing when, in my opinion, he should have been behind bars.

Let us remember that sports, while often mimicking certain aspects of life, and inspiring many of us as it does with tremendous athletic ability as well as mental discipline, nevertheless falls under the umbrella of entertainment. It is no wonder, then, that some of us get a little too wrapped up in sports from time to time. Hell, it is as good an escape from the grim realities of the world as any. But that does not give us, the fans of these sports and the athletes who play and define them, the right to simply pretend like the people who play them are always heroes who have character traits that we should admire. To pretend that someone who has shown himself to be not just tremendously stupid off the field, but to outright engage in criminal behavior precisely because he believes the hype surrounding his position in a popular sport is now someone to be admired is making us at least partially responsible. After all, he seems to have thought that he could pretty much do whatever he wanted, whenever he wanted because he was the star quarterback of one of the league's iconic franchises. In other words, he was convinced that he could get away with it, because the rules that govern over everyone else do not apply to him. He is, after all, the star quarterback for the Pittsburgh Steelers. And when we celebrate him, and sweep away the inconvenient aspects of a very disturbing past because it makes us uncomfortable, then we very much justify his sense of entitlement to engage in those kinds of behaviors, and for other sports stars to get away with it, as well. In other words, we are a part of the problem, and not necessarily a small part.

Maybe I was alone in my contempt for the man after those incidents. Certainly, there ahve been times where it felt that way, and never as much as recently, when people - by which I mean the adoring fans - praised him and showered him with more love than i have seen for almost any other athlete. All of the stations seemed to sing his praise. Women were holding up giant sized posters of his damn face at the Chiefs game. Most other quarterbacks - even Super Bowl winning quarterbacks, do not quite get that much love when they depart. It all felt very forced and, frankly, disingenuous to me. I for one could not enjoy his presence in the league for well over a decade now. It was hard to forget his very bad behavior of the past, and hard to gloss over reprehensible acts that we would not forgive so easily if they had been committed against our sisters, or our daughters, or our mothers. He should not be above the law. But he seems to have indeed been above the law, in terms of getting away with something that any of the rest of us ordinary folks would not necessarily have gotten away with. And that, at least in good part, is on us, at least if we allow it to be. Shame on Ben Roethlisberger, absolutely. But also shame on us for now praising this person who was evidently such a monster. Who's to say how much he has changed since then, or even if he has even changed, quite frankly? He was a blight on football in particular, and in sports - and perhaps our celebrity obsessed society - more generally. 

So no praise for him now. Not from me, anyway. 

What can I say about him, now that his NFL career is apparently, most likely over?

Good riddance to bad rubbish. 

Friday, February 4, 2022

Red Hot Chili Peppers - Black Summer (Official Music Video)




Red Hot Chili Peppers Release New Song “Black Summer” 


Yes, the Red Hot Chili Peppers, one of the most iconic bands from the Lollapalooza age of the 1990’s, have just released a new song.              

It is called Black Summer, and it is the first taste that they have given for their upcoming album, Unlimited Love. The album is set to be releases in the spring, and will be followed up with a major tour by the band.


Below is the the track list for the upcoming album, as documented by an article recently published in Rolling Stone magazine (see link below):


Unlimited Love Tracklist  

1. “Black Summer” 

2. “Here Ever After” 

3. “Aquatic Mouth Dance” 

4. “Not the One” 

5. “Poster Child” 

6. “The Great Apes” 

7. “It’s Only Natural” 

8. “She’s a Lover” 

9. “These Are the Ways” 

10. “Whatchu Thinkin'” 

11. “Bastards of Light” 

12. “White Braids & Pillow Chair” 

13. “One Way Traffic” 

14. “Veronica” 

15. “Let ‘Em Cry” 

16. “The Heavy Wing” 

17. “Tangelo”



Red Hot Chili Peppers Preview New LP With ‘Black Summer’ Video by Althea Legaspi, February 4, 2022:  Unlimited Love marks guitarist John Frusciante’s first new music with the group since 2006

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/red-hot-chili-peppers-unlimited-love-album-black-summer-song-video-1294894/

Thursday, February 3, 2022

Tom Brady Officially Retires

 Tom Brady


Well, it has happened. Tom Brady, who most feel has earned the right to be considered the Greatest Of All Time (GOAT) has called it a career by announcing his retirement from the NFL.

My own feelings on the matter are a bit paradoxical. It is strange, in some ways, because a lot of people cannot stand him, finding him arrogant, or a prima donna, or whatever. I always found those kinds of things and the loathing that people feel for him to be a bit exaggerated. Yet, he did strike me at times as being a bit pompous and full of himself, although ironically, there are other times when he seemed actually quite humble, all things considered. 

For a little while, when it seemed that one of Tom Brady's teams was preparing for a Super Bowl almost ever single year - remember that he has been the starting quarterback for five of the last seven Super Bowls, and won four of those - I kept posting blog entries exploring the age old question as to whether he or Joe Montana should rightly be considered the GOAT. It became obvious to me after a while - probably around the time that Brady orchestrated that amazing comeback against the Falcons in the Super Bowl to win it - that there really was not much of an actual debate anymore. It actually kind of hurt a little to admit it, because even though I am not a Tom Brady hater by any stretch, I will readily admit to liking Montana a lot more than Brady. This might seem a bit strange, since I cannot stand the 49ers. Yet, I always liked Montana, as well as Jerry Rice, who I still think is easily, hands down, the GOAT in terms of wide receivers. Also, Bill Walsh, who seemed almost sagely, at least by football standards. On the other hand, I never disliked any of Brady's team. I had pulled for the New England Patriots when younger, and when their results were almost pathetic at times. Ditto with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. And also, admittedly, a part of why I was almost happy for Brady is that he is the last major athlete to enjoy this success while being more or less my age (he is less than three years younger than me). 

Yet, the numbers do not lie. I may prefer Montana, and he was undeniably great, but the numbers simply spoke for themselves. Montana won four Super Bowls, and he was simply perfect in them. Dazzling. No interceptions. Never lost one. He was named Super Bowl MVP three times, and he won some memorable games in very dramatic fashion. Indeed, I think that he was the GOAT.

But that was then, and this is now. Tom Brady is the GOAT. Montana was the starting quarterback for seven conference championship games during his career with two teams, winning four of them. Brady was the starting quarterback for a staggering 13 conference championship games, winning 10 of them, doubling his next closest competitor, John Elway (who reached the Super Bowl five times, and won twice). Montana was named the Super Bowl MVP three times in his four wins. Brady was named the Super Bowl MVP five times in his seven wins. Brady enjoyed unparalleled success in his stint with two teams, and holds just about every major quarterback record in the books. He started 316 of 318 games, although it should be noted here that he missed some games, including four because he was banned, and almost the entire 2008 season because of a serious leg injury. Brady holds the record for the most regular season and postseason wins by any quarterback, and it is not even close. He won three NFL MVP awards, which is tied for second with Brett Favre (Peyton Manning holds the record with five). Brady holds the record for most Pro Bowl selections, most pass attempts, most completions, most passing yards, and most touchdowns. Given all of what this paragraph alone just mentions, the debate about who is the GOAT has been over for some time now. In truth, it was over a long time ago. Again, for me, I stopped engaging in the debate once Brady led his team from 28-3 down in the second half of Super Bowl LI and orchestrated one of the greatest comebacks ever seen in any game, Super Bowl or not. 

So today, I honor Tom Brady. Whether or not people find him likeable, he was a constant presence in the NFL for over two decades now. I remember his first season as a starter, back in 2001. I actually attended two of his games for the Patriots, one of which turned out to be a Super Bowl preview in New England against the Rams. The other was the Jets game at the Meadowlands. He secured his starting position as the year went on, even though the Patriots had their star quarterback already in Drew Bledsoe. Brady proved to be so good, that he essentially just took it from Bledsoe. 

All of that was quite a while ago. He made it big then, and was known to the football world. Once he earned another Super Bowl ring with Belichick and the Pats, he became quite well known in the sports world, one of the biggest stars. A year later, when he won his third, he began to warrant consideration as one of the all-time greats. That was only in his fourth year as an NFL starting quarterback, and he was still pretty young. Since then, he became so huge, that you do not even have to be a sports fan to know who he is. His reputation precedes him, and he is a household name.

That both comes with the territory and is a result of being the GOAT, which Tom Brady undeniably is. It is hard to imagine anyone ever matching what he did, or even coming close, let alone surpassing him. Then again, the same could have been said before, and along came Tom Brady. So time will tell.




Tom Brady Retires With All The Records by Josh Hermsmeyer, Feb. 1, 2022:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/tom-brady-retires-with-all-the-records/

Stephen King & J.J. Abrams Set to Team Up For Upcoming Billy Summers Project



Back in October, I reviewed the newest novel by Stephen King. It was called Billy Summers, and yes, I very much enjoyed it. If you would like to read my review specifically, here is the link to my blog entry review of the book:


Book Review of Billy Summers by Stephen King, published on October 12, 2021:

https://charbor74.blogspot.com/2021/10/book-review-of-billy-summers-by-stephen.html


I have long been a fan of Stephen King’s works. So I pretty much read everything that he comes out with. And this was, for me, one of his very best books in years. People who are only casually familiar at best with some of King's books or movies may be under the impression that almost all he ever does is horror. But that is not true. Surely, the Shawshank Redemption is not a typical horror story. Neither is The Green Mile. Or The Body, a story better known to audiences from the movie Stand By Me. Hell, his seminal work, the expansive Dark Tower series, is not really horror, either. And neither is this book, for that matter. 

Don't get me wrong, many of those works have some elements of horror within them. More often than not, they deal with dark matters at some point or other. But if you are scared of horror and thus feel trepidation about picking up a King novel, you can rest assured that there will be nothing in those books that will make you want to cower in a corner and pull the blankets closer around you. Nothing that will make you scared or remember some horrifying imagery, as in other famous King works. The popularity of Pennywise from It, for example, seems to be pretty terrifying. And everybody seems to enjoy Jack Nicholson's portrayal of Jack Torrance, which is also good for a scare (even though King was, in fact, not a big fan of the movie interpretation of his book, The Shining). 

There are other famous works by King that are not typically horror, either. Thinking of 11/22/63, which came to be a popular television show. Certainly, Hearts in Atlantis was not scary, either the book or the movie that comes from it (and covered about a third of it). The Green Dragon also is not scary at all. Hell, this guy wrote a book with another author (Stewart O'Nan) documenting the 2004 Boston Red Sox baseball season and championship run. I do not even think that The Dead Zone can necessarily accurately be put into the horror genre, although I can understand that, since it is dark enough, and does have some scary moments. It even has a monster of sorts, although this monster is a populist politician on the rise and seemingly having a date with destiny. There are probably other works by him which are not immediately coming to mind, but which also are not scary and/or cannot be adequately lumped into the horror genre. 

So, even though this book, and the television movie or series that will come from it, will likely be billed as coming from "the master of horror," I do not actually think that this give people a fair idea of what this particular novel, and the movie adaptation, will be about. In fact, it detracts from the book, which actually had far more to offer than most people would think a typical "horror" novel or movie would offer. 

As for who might play the title character?

Stephen King has some ideas on that, too. There is somebody he has in mind - a well-known actor, who he feels would be ideal for the role:

"Well, given his age, which is probably mid-40s, there are a lot of actors that could do that part very well," King shared with Rolling Stone about Billy Summers. "I think maybe the most underrated actor working right now is Jake Gyllenhaal and he'd made a wonderful Billy. But we're just blue-skying here. There are a lot of people who would be good."  

No word that I can see as to when we will be able to view this movie or television series adaptation, or even when it would be filmed, or anything. Guess we will have to stay tuned for that.







Stephen King & J.J. Abrams Reteam on Billy Summers Adaptation by Spencer Perry, February 1, 2022:


https://comicbook.com/tv-shows/news/stephen-king-j-j-abrams-reteam-on-billy-summers-adaptation/?fbclid=IwAR2gSmiX8-dcQPXv7-J0vj4VQUwuwHmK54357HMTthsS4CtKOUmcnBmtQAc




 

Wednesday, February 2, 2022

Art Spiegelman’s Maus Banned in Tennessee School

"We should all see attacks on books as an 'early warning' signal that attacks on humans cannot be far behind."

- Richard Ovenden from Burning the Books: A History of the Deliberate Destruction of Knowledge



These are the kinds of stories that keep recurring through the years. Yes, over and over, you hear stories of schools and libraries banning certain works from famous authors, because somebody objects to something in the book. It seems to happen to almost every author at one point or another. After all, you will almost always find somebody somewhere in a country as huge as the United States to take offense to something, even in books widely perceived to be powerful and respected. Some of the names often included in these kinds of bans include J.D. Salinger, George Orwell, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Kurt Vonnegut, and even Mark Twain.              

Often times, these kinds of bands actually have the opposite of the intended consequences. These school boards will make headlines by placing these bans, and that will generate controversy. Then, the work in question will suddenly see a resurgence in popularity. Also, these school boards often face a torrent of criticism, and allegations of de facto censorship. Sometimes, they even back down, although that likely does not happen all that frequently.              

Well, it has happened again. This time, it happened in Tennessee. The McMinn County School Board's unanimous vote to remove Art Spiegelman’s Maus from their curriculum. Most people are aware of the book. Spiegelman is a cartoonist, and Maus is his most famous book. It documents his relationship with his father, who survived the Holocaust, and who was sent to Auschwitz by the Nazis. His father also revealed some prejudices of his own in the book, particularly against black people.              

What did the school board object to?              

Well actually, there were a few things that they apparently did not like. There are eight curse words in the book, as well as an image of a nude woman, which was depicted to show the suicide of the author’s mother.              

The swear words are predictable. As for the nudity, or perhaps the objection to the depiction of suicide that goes with it?  Do they really think that typical teenagers will get aroused by the portrayal of a nude woman about to kill herself? If there are kids like that, most likely they have bigger problems than the school board can do much of anything about and, frankly, the book will not likely be what sets the kid off or pushes him over the edge. Or do they think that will be shocking or harmful to their delicate sensibilities, while the actual suicide, let alone the whole story of the Holocaust and Auschwitz in the book will not be? Maybe it's just me, but I simply don't get it.

Again, this book is about things from the author’s life that actually happened, either to him or to people very close to him (particularly his parents). It is a both a historical and biographical account, and the illustrated nature of the book adds another unique element to it. All of that combines to make this book more accessible in many respects than other books might otherwise be. The illustrations make it more immediate and, yes, visible. In some ways, it can be considered more visually powerful than a movie or television depiction, because of the character portrayals, particularly by nationality. Finally, it is very personal, which makes it quite moving. The author goes into detail about his own grappling with what happened, how his parents were impacted, and the father’s own seeming racism that survived his getting out of the Holocaust alive.              

In short, it is an important work that can really help people understand the Holocaust a lot better. Given that some headlines these days suggest a rather shocking level of ignorance about this topic among Americans, with some suggestions that two-thirds of Americans do not know that six millions Jews were killed, and other findings showing that a quarter of Americans believe that the reports and statistics regarding the Holocaust are exaggerated.





Why a school board's ban on 'Maus' may put the book in the hands of more readers by Rachel Treisman, January 31, 2022:

https://www.npr.org/2022/01/31/1076970866/maus-banned-tennessee-school-board?utm_medium=social&utm_term=nprnews&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=npr&fbclid=IwAR0p2LnnDPEojkFE3YMhpPK8um0HqZkNI4YEo9aIsiPbMjFVUkSx9i08_lM

Tuesday, February 1, 2022

Romney Warns That Eliminating the Filibuster, Could Propel Trump Back to the White House

The country, and indeed the world, received a shock on November of 2016. That, of course, was when the United States elected Donald Trump to the White House. From that point onward, millions of Americans - particularly those on the left - have been wondering how that possibly could have happened, and just how far the erosion and even a general and genuine decline in the country has gone. Often times the answers have hardly been comforting. Many people, for example, have a hard time even acknowledging that the problems in this country go far, far beyond just Trump. Get rid of him as the problem, and for many, it seems that the problems are solved. It is that kind of thinking that led to Trump rising to become president in the first place, quite frankly.

Indeed, while many on the left have wrestled and struggled with what sure looks and feel like a serious level of rot in the country, the opposite is true on the right. The vast majority of elected GOP officials on the highest levels of government - Congress in particular - have quickly gotten behind Trump. Earlier criticisms of him by some high-ranking members - including but not limited to Ted Cruz, John McCain, Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, Jeb Bush, Mitt Romney, Jeff Flake, and Paul Ryan - pretty much fell by the wayside. Bush dropped out of the presidential race, McCain died, Flake decided not to run again, but most of the others simply complied with Trump's bullying and trying to force everyone into lock and step.

Almost all Republicans complied, yes. Perhaps the two most blatantly disgusting and wormy examples were from Graham and Cruz, both of whom actually seemed almost to be outdoing one another in terms of ridding themselves of their intellectual and moral responsibilities to the country, and simply licking Trump's boots. Graham and Cruz both blasted Trump in 2015 and 2016 for being exactly what Trump is and always has been. Namely, a con artist and a well-established liar, as well as an overgrown, spoiled child. And just as quickly, both ended their criticisms abruptly and become Trump's most ardent supporters in Congress instead. At least Graham finally found a change of heart when he saw what happened in Washington on January 6th. As for Cruz, he seemed to be able to get over everything and forgive Trump his many, many trespasses as a rule. Even Trump insulting Cruz's wife was not enough to stiffen his spine even a little bit, because it would not be politically profitable to do so. Cruz and Graham should deservedly be remembered for revealing themselves as political weasels.

Not all Republicans remained silent or compliant, however. Of those names mentioned above, only one still seems willing to stand alone against Trump and all that he represents. True, the Bush family hardly seems like big fans of Trump or Trumpism, but their criticism are very often measured and mostly mild, despite not holding any office currently. But one man is still holding office, and willing to risk his political future by standing against Trumpism. 

That, of course, would be Mitt Romney, the Senator from Utah. Romney was critical of Trump early on, seemed to warm to him for a little while, and then instead remained critical. To his credit, that made him visibly braver than pretty much almost all other members of Congress, with maybe the sole exception of Liz Cheney, the daughter of former Vice-President Dick Cheney.

Romney and Cheney are unlikely heroes, although they are being hailed as such by many on the left these days. Not sure that I would go nearly that far with any admiration, although I am impressed that they at least took a stand against an obviously authoritarian figure who appeals to the demons of the very worst nature among far too many Americans. It is a paradox, almost, because it is considered brave to stand up to Trump i you are a Republican, but it should not be, frankly. Members of the same party often have disagreed with one another. That is especially true among Democrats, admittedly, who are kind of famous for infighting. But Republicans often disagreed with one another, as well. Somehow, that went away under the pressure of Trump's bullying and mean-spirited tweets and such. It seemed that all too quickly and easily, criticisms of Trump by people on the right largely ceased. In place of this criticism, too often, were horrendous displays of fake and forced unity, such as when every prominent member of Trump's administration sang his praises publicly at one point, for all the nightly news cameras to show the country later that evening. Those seemed to be the prevailing political winds for Republicans, even though resistance could easily have strengthened if more Republicans actually were willing to criticize Trump and Trumpism.

So while I am not quite yet ready to honor either Romney or Cheney for profiles in political courage, it nevertheless is obvious that they should be given credit for at least putting their country ahead of political profit. It would have been so much easier simply to stifle their criticism, but they have not done so. It cost Cheney quite a lot already. Romney, who is wealthy already, has managed to survive politically somehow, to his credit, and remained independent from the general line of the Republican Party, which former Speaker John Boehner rightly suggested should be called the Trump party by this point. 

It seems fair to suggest that Romney likely does not want to see Trump reach the White House again. And right or wrong, agree or disagree, Romney feels that some of the desires by those on the left, and obviously the Democrats more generally, might actually have the opposite of the intended effect. Specifically, Romney warned that some of these measures might actually make a return to the Oval Office by Trump almost inevitable. Here is what Romney said, specifically, about the possibility of getting rid of the filibuster on the Senate floor recently:

"The United States Senate is one of our vital democratic institutions, and the power given to the minority in the Senate and the resulting requirement for political consensus are among the Senate's defining features.

"Note that in the federal government, empowerment of the minority is established through only one institution: the Senate. The majority decides in the House; the majority decides in the Supreme Court; and the president, of course, is a majority of one. Only in the Senate does the minority restrain the power of the majority."

Frankly, I think that Romney might just have a point here. Sure, I understand the frustrations by Democrats against things that have been misused and abused by Republicans, and not just for the past four years. The filibuster would be one of them, and Supreme Court nominations would be yet another. Democrats seem to largely favor increasing the number of Supreme Court Justices, as a means of effectively ending the GOP stranglehold on the Supreme Court. But these measures are likely, inevitably, going to be diluted at best, if not outright negated or eliminated at worst, once Republicans gain power again. And it might take all of five minutes before they implement these changes and give themselves the power again, perhaps more than ever before. Plus, it seems to validate concerns that there is some kind of left-leaning conspiracy against Trump and his loyal entourage of cultists. 

No, I do not know what the answers are. All I know is that the same old thinking, of temporary political solutions to decades of consistent losing in the most important elections are not going to fix the seemingly crushing number and severity of problems facing this country. Certainly, Trump offers no real solution or intelligence or anything to the myriad problems the country has to deal with. But those on the left, and particularly Democrats, seem to have made shooting themselves in the foot almost an art form, because they are so profoundly good at that. So Romney may indeed have a point here.

What do you guys out there think? 


Romney warns against getting rid of filibuster, citing possible Trump win in 2024  by Joseph Choi, 1/12/2022:     

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/romney-warns-against-getting-rid-of-filibuster-citing-possible-trump-win-in-2024/ar-AASHVNx?li=BB141NW3