Tuesday, June 6, 2017

Anniversary of the D-Day Invasion - June 6

I was not around for D-Day. Hell, my parents were not even born yet for it!

Yet, much like with the rest of World War II, these events grew to the status of legend, so that you kind of grew up under their shadow, even as late as during my own childhood in the eighties, predominately.

There are times when you view these things as history, and it remains relegated to this status. The problem with that, of course, is that you cannot change history, which means that it seems like an immovable object of sorts, like the events were etched in stone.

In truth, of course, that was far from the case.

I remember the first time I watched "Saving Private Ryan:", and just beginning to really appreciate just how incredibly frightening, and far from certain, that day would have been to those who were there. Many of the soldiers were simply mowed down by Germans in what seemed almost impregnable positions (although they were, in fact, overtaken). Others, as the movie so graphically depicted, lost limbs.

All sorts of stories have endured, and lasted many decades now. Again, World War II was one of the most significant events in world history. When I think about it, and just how dramatically, and quickly, the maps changed, and how many millions of people had their lives severely effected (and sixty million people overall were killed!), and you think of all of the major battles that took place, including the bloodiest war in history between the Soviets and the Germans on the Eastern Front! How quickly technology advanced in such a short period, and all of it geared for war, with ever increasing military power, culminating in the detonation of the atomic bomb, and two of those bombs being dropped on Japan. It really is just staggering!

And D-Day was certainly not the least of these! It might sound cliche to say, but soldiers gave their life and limbs to gain a foothold on the western front of the European continent, in the fight against what my father once termed a "truly evil empire".

So, on this, the 73rd anniversary of D-Day, I take a moment to recognize the sacrifice of those brave soldiers who were there on the beaches of Normandy on that day 73 years ago.




Here are some links to the story of the 70th anniversary of D-Day:



70 years after D-Day, she hears dad's stories anew Associated Press By BETH J. HARPAZ

http://news.yahoo.com/70-years-d-day-she-hears-dads-stories-165315997.html




D-Day veterans: The last voices of the longest day

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/history/dday-veterans-the-last-voices-of-the-longest-day-9464306.html




D-day landings scenes in 1944 and now – interactive by Peter Macdiarmid and Jim Powell of The Guardian, June 1, 2014:

http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/ng-interactive/2014/jun/01/d-day-landings-scenes-in-1944-and-now-interactive


A Not Quite Funeral for a Friend



Over the weekend, I attended a memorial service for an old friend, who died from a heart attack last month.

Now, memorial service does not quite describe what it was. It certainly was not a funeral or a wake, and it was more of something of a celebration of his life.

Interesting idea.

His name was Bruce, and he was a good man. He really made a point of helping his friends out, of staying loyal, and just had a feel for how to go about helping friends. Also, he had one of the richest senses of humor of anyone that I ever met.

Yes, he was very quick witted. There was one time, when we were doing a radio show together. This was one of the very few times that I ever dabbled in radio, back in the mid-nineties. I was in charge of sports, but was quite nervous in the studio, even though it was only broadcasting to a very small audience. Still, it seemed like a good idea to try and do something unique, to be witty on my own, and hopefully hold up my end of the bargain, so to speak.

I was reciting the previous night's baseball scores, and was trying to spice it up, make it a bit amusing and unpredictable. At one point, trying to say that the Cleveland Indians had gotten their buttocks beaten down, I stumbled, and instead said that the other team (sorry, can't remember who the other team was) had beaten the Cleveland buttocks. I tried to correct myself, but Bruce was very quick to pick up on the mistake, and make it into what would turn out to be a running joke for years to come.

"Ah, yes, the Cleveland Buttocks!" Bruce mused, without missing a beat. He went on to mention that he had been following that franchise for years. By that point, feeling nervous about my mistake and amused by what he had turned into a pretty funny joke, I was laughing, and effectively rendered useless as a result.

Bruce was always like that. He was always that guy that made everyone laugh, and after this weekend, hearing stories that other people who knew him far longer than I had, there was this sense that not only was he very funny, but he was an incredibly decent human being, to boot. He was a big guy, and in his high school days he used his size to protect smaller kids against bullies. Nobody wanted to mess with Bruce. Trust me, when I knew him, chances are nobody would want to then, either. I kid you not in mentioning how big and imposing he could be, although at the time, I never even knew that he could have a mean bone in his body, because he generally was too busy making people laugh.

Indeed, though, he could be a bad ass when he wanted to be, although from what I gather, the running theme of the stories shared this past weekend was that he did not do this to be an ass, but only in response to other kids bullying the weak, particularly his friends. One guy even suggested that Bruce was "the equalizer" in high school. He himself could not possibly hope to fight back against stronger kids, being perhaps 120 pounds soaking wet. But when Bruce stepped in to defend his friends, his trademark sense of humor was gone. He would be deadly serious, and legitimately angry. And trust me, like the also late David Banner from the Incredible Hulk series back in the 1980's, you did not want to make Bruce angry. If you notice in the pictures, there is actually a photograph of a professional wrestler, the Big Boss Man. He was a professional wrestler that played a bad guy cop, and as such, he was obviously very physically imposing. At one point, Bruce and a few friends were going through a toy store, when they encountered this action figure, and it looked so much lke Bruce, that as a joke, they bought it. This, too, became a running joke, albeit one that I personally only learned about this past weekend.

Bruce might have had a rich sense of humor and loved to make people laugh, but the end of his life was no joke. He was mostly a loner, with few family members, and most of them had already died. He had diabetes, and at one point, this affected his right leg seriously enough that he had needed it amputated. I wrote part of a blog entry about that - an angry one as an illustration of the failure of the American healthcare system and how it impacts real life people - although I never did finish it. Still, it seems appropriate enough to include that soon, although not in this particular blog, which will be my attempt to honor Bruce.

And so, it was a strange kind of event. Neither a funeral nor a wake, although something to honor Bruce's life. Everyone said that he would have wanted heavy metal to be playing there, and so it was. 

And for at least one last time, his friends gathered and shared stories about Bruce, and allowed his memory, his sense of humor, and the overall decent quality of who he was, to be kept alive, at least one last time.

RIP, Bruce Hessian.











Monday, June 5, 2017

The Beatles Historical 'Sgt. Pepper' Album at 50 Years Old


Photo by Luiz Fernando Reis (Bealtes cor 36 on Flickr) 
Creative Commons License -https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

beatles



The Beatles made an indelible mark on music history, although for most people, the 'Sgt. Pepper' album was when this band went from being very good, and one of the best of their time, to immortals, one of the greatest musical acts of all time. 

Other bands, perhaps especially the Beach Boys, had grown ever more experimental, and so the Beatles felt compelled to respond with a unique sound of their own. And respond they did!

'Sgt. Pepper's' was not like anything that had come before. It set a new bar for music and, indeed, a musical explosion was about to occur. The music of the late 1960's and early 1970's was more experimental than any other time period that had come before. When you think of the type of music that was the most popular in the 1950's and early 1960's, and then you think of some of the incredible musical acts of the late 1960's and early 1970's, the differences are almost staggering!

That is not to say that all of it was greatly influenced by the Beatles, or by the 'Sgt. Pepper' album. However, much of it was, and it is impossible to imagine what that music might have sounded like without the Beatles. Ringo Starr once said that there would have been some other band that would have become just like the Beatles, although that seems doubtful. After all, the level of musical talent, and even genius, on that band, is probably unlike any rock band before or since. And for the time that they were in the Beatles together, the band was able to put away their egos long enough to make some incredible music. They fed off of one another, brought out the best in each other individually, and collectively. That is why the music that came out of the band stands apart so strongly, and is so remembered, and really, revered, even after all of these years. It has been more than half a century since the Beatles first arrived on the scene, and half a century since 'Sgt. Pepper's,' and yet still their music is beloved and remembered and relevant.

Indeed, that is the greatest testament to the Beatles and their music, the fact that it is still remembered and listened to after all of these years! Few musical acts are remembered quite as fondly as the Beatles are, and that is why they continue to stand apart. And 'Sgt. Pepper' was perhaps the single album that stood out the most out of their albums, and they were indeed all memorable. 

So here, for the last time, here is a blog entry that will honor the 50th anniversary of this incredible album, and of my favorite rock band of all time. I have not yet gotten the 50th anniversary re-release album yet, although having heard snippets of it during the last couple of weeks or so, that will surely change. However, I love their music and continue to listen to it, something that has been the case since the earliest childhood memories that I can recall. The Beatles broke up years before my birth, and John Lennon's assassination was one of my first memories of a major news story, because it happened when I was still very young. But somehow, it feels like they have remained relevant throughout, and that they, above all others, will continue to endure, and to leave their mark. They are beyond the fashion and identities of their times, and their music and legacy have allowed them to attain a certain immortal, even timeless status. 

Indeed, that is just about the highest honor that anyone can bestow on another, and it reveals quite a lot that it seems almost to not be enough to describe the Beatles, and the lasting impact that their music continues to have even to this day!



The Beatles 'A Day In The Life' Is A Landmark In Sound Engineering 50 Years After It Was Recorded by Kevin Murnane, June 3, 2017:


Sunday, June 4, 2017

Soviet Brutality Played Huge Role in the Defeat of Nazi Germany

This is not to suggest that the Germans were merely victims, either in Dresden in February of 1945, or in Berlin a few months after that. Clearly, by supporting Hitler and not supporting any kind of coup against him, even when it was clear that he was losing a war and leading Germany to disaster, the Germans have to take responsibility. And let us be clear: Germany was the aggressor that initiated the outbreak of World War II in Europe. They were blamed for the First World War as well, and although they were at least in large part responsible, the other European warring powers were largely as responsible as well. But the outbreak of World War II in Europe was entirely the doing of Nazi Germany.

That said, the Allied powers that got away with blaming Germany solely as responsible for World War I have also conveniently divorced themselves from responsibility with the atrocities that they were responsible for during the war, as well. There were numerous cities, particularly in Germany and Japan, that were bombed to rubble, with enormous civilian casualties - and that does not even necessarily include the two most famous ones - Hiroshima and Nagasaki!

And yes, the Soviets were incredibly brutal and abusive towards German women once they occupied the Reich.

Of course, we all know that the Nazi German Reich were hardly innocent in their own right. Over the course of many decades now, we have learned of the historically unprecedented levels of abuse and downright evil that the Nazi war machine unleashed. There certainly was rape committed by German troops in occupied territories and prison camps, and there were obviously plenty of murders and crimes against humanity. And we all know about the death camps, and Germany remains the sole nation in the history of the world to have built places to send some of their own people with the specific intent of murdering them.

Still, this cannot justify an anything goes mentality when it came to revenge upon Germans, although this is apparently exactly what happened. This is especially true among the invading Soviets. They had seen Germany invade their nation four years earlier, after conquering most of Europe. Indeed initially, the Germans were moving quickly into Soviet territory, as well, and for much of the outside world, it looked like Germany was about to take over the Soviet Union and, indeed, make it a de facto German colony. 

But the forward march was stopped dead in it's track once Stalin and the rest of the Soviet Union got over the initial shock. Stalin was ready for a bloody affair, and he knew what was at stake. To that end, he sent his soldier to the front line with not only German guns and weapons pointed in their direction in front of them, but with Soviet guns pointed at their backs, at least figuratively speaking. It stopped being figurative if any Soviets showed any signs of cowardice or retreat. There was no choice but to fight, and fight with everything you have, fight for your life. 

What followed was the bloodiest war in human history, and that is saying something! The biggest battle took place in Stalingrad. Out of every thousand troops sent there, by both sides, only three came out alive! The Germans sent still more men and supplies there, knowing how valuable those oil fields would be for their cause, but Stalin sent still more Soviet troops. All along the front of Hitler's eastern war, the Germans were stopped dead in their track. They never got much past Leningrad up north, never reached Moscow, even though one German general claimed that they got so close that he could see the towers and spires from inside of the Kremlin. And ultimately, the Germans never took Stalingrad. They were defeated there, and for the first time, Hitler's troops began retreating. They would ultimately continue to retreat all the way back to the borders of the Reich itself in time and, eventually, would retreat all the way back to the capital, Berlin, before the final curtain of the European war fell, ending with Hitler's suicide, and then the unconditional surrender by a beaten foe.

Before the surrender, however, the Soviets entering the German Reich were hungry for revenge. They viewed themselves as liberators, and as such, seemed to feel that this gave them license to act out in any way that they wanted. 

That translated to some horror stories, where German females were abused by Soviet troops.

Of course, the Soviets themselves denied this unsavory role, dismissing it as mere Western propaganda. Even to this day, Russians deny that rape en masse ever took place as the Soviets troops entered the border of the Reich.

However, there is some proof coming from Soviet troops themselves. In Lucy Ash's BBC article, "The Rape of Berlin," she recounts the surprising tale of one young Soviet officer who kept diaries which gave some surprising details about this era and what transpired behind Soviet lines:

Vladimir Gelfand, a young Jewish lieutenant from central Ukraine, wrote with extraordinary frankness from 1941 through to the end of the war, despite the Soviet military's ban on diaries, which were seen as a security risk.

What he documents in his diary is truly horrific, and suggests that the mass rape of German women was more than just a myth, propagated by the West. It was real, and it was horrible. Some German women were raped by as many as 20 Soviet troops on the same night, taking turns, with some coming back for seconds. In some cases, women were raped in front of their children. 

At one point, Gelfand was riding a bicycle through a park in Berlin, when he encountered a group of German women traveling in a pack together, carrying some belonging s and trying to make their escape. He confronted them, and learned that they had suffered these kinds of humiliations and horrors at the hand of Soviet troops. 

Naturally, the Soviets used the horrors of the invading Nazi troops into Soviet territory as justification for their own abuses once the time came when the Soviets entered the Reich. After all, German troops also abused and raped Soviet women en masse, and were guilty of other horrendous actions, as well. Once the Soviets found themselves in German territory, they were ready for big-time revenge. 

The Soviet leadership themselves seemed to take an almost passive-aggressive kind of approach. Officially, the Soviet leadership was against abuses and rape by their troops, and denied it's existence. Yet, at some point, there were posters reminding the Soviet troops that they were now in German territory, and that the hour of revenge was at hand. It was a systematic sort of dehumanizing of the once powerful German nation, as well as revenge.

Also, the Soviet troops were starved for sex, so that German females of almost all ages were seen as ripe for the taking. In Antony Beevor's article in "The Guardian" reports, neither young girls nor elderly women were safe:

Natalya Gesse, a close friend of the scientist Andrei Sakharov, had observed the Red Army in action in 1945 as a Soviet war correspondent. "The Russian soldiers were raping every German female from eight to eighty," she recounted later. "It was an army of rapists."

As we begin to revisit some of the horrors of World War II perpetrated by the ultimately victorious allied nations, such as the various firebombings by British and American forces, we might want to make sure the record of this Soviet brutality is also understood and remembered for it's horrors and excess, as well.




'They raped every German female from eight to 80' by Antony Beevor, May 1, 2002:






The rape of Berlin By Lucy Ash BBC News, Berlin 1 May 2015


Saturday, June 3, 2017

"Three's Company" Little Known Facts Revealed

I have written about Three's Company before, although the memory of exactly what was written, or what the blog was even about, eludes me now.

However, after running into this link very recently, it seemed definitely worth sharing for any old fans of this sitcom, like myself.

Honestly, thought I had a good grasp of what was what behind the scenes for this sitcom, but many of these facts were quite new and previously unknown to me!

Of course, the show was meant to be enjoyed, and not to be taken too seriously. It was a different time, a different era, and this was definitely reflected in the popular television shows of the day, like this one. 

Frankly, my brother and I must have watched this show every day (or at least every week day) for years, and we likely both have seen every episode of this show five or six times over, because it was always being replayed at that point.

Three's Company might be one of the main reasons that neither of us did very well in high school, although admittedly, if it had not been for that show, we likely would have watched some other show or shows, instead.

Still, since it was Three's Company, there is a special place in my heart for it, and even though I very rarely watch it anymore, it is still enjoyable to watch an episode every now and then, or to open up a link like this one about the show.

That said, I have a friend who is a big fan of the show, and he once summed up every episode quite aptly, using one word: misunderstanding.

And that about sums it up. But if you want to explore some little known facts on the show, open up the link below to find out more:

Behind The Scenes Secrets From The Set Of "Three's Company" By Josh Lake | October 26, 2016:

http://www.tworeddots.com/view/threes-company-behind-the-scene-fact-you-never-knew/?src=3&utm_source=taboola&utm_medium=wideopencountry&utm_campaign=510238&utm_key=140&utm_term=TRD_D_threes-company-behind-the-scene-fact-you-never-knew

Friday, June 2, 2017

Man Child President Pulls U.S. Out of Paris Accord

Yup, he's done it again.

Every single day during the life of this particular administration, you wake up in the morning, bracing yourself for what the next hugely disappointing bit of news coming from the White House will be.

And you have to give this much to this president - he consistently produces that kind of news. The kind that makes thinking adults with any sense of responsibility towards the country, and towards the future, just absolutely cringe.

Surely by now, everyone knows the latest news. The overgrown child, who somehow got to play president for real, pulled the United States out of the Paris Climate Accord. It is not official yet, although that now seems a mere formality.

By withdrawing the United States out of the accord, Trump made the United States stand out, although predictably, for all of the wrong reasons once again. Only two other countries are not members of the Paris Accord - Nicaragua and Syria.

In the case of Nicaragua, they did not join because they did not feel that the Paris Accord went far enough, that it was too voluntary, and lacked teeth against offenders.

As for war torn Syria, so many sanctions have been placed upon them, that they can hardly go anywhere outside of their own country.

Which leaves the United States, standing alone once again, for all of the wrong reasons. Once again, relying on so called expertise from the tiny minority of scientists who deny human involvement in climate change, and who are being funded by the oil industry and other major corporate polluters, the United States took the de facto position that this whole crisis is overblown, and that the only thing that matters in this world are more profits for corporations.

Leave it to the billionaire, man child president to proudly hail this position. He even had the audacity to suggest that the whole world was laughing at the United States, although he implied that this was because America had accepted such a bad deal for them to begin with. In reality, the entire world is laughing at the United States, that much he is right about. But they are laughing precisely because such a man child is now in charge, and so clearly separated from reality.

Despite this being seriously terrible news, there are certain things that are encouraging.

One thing that I personally take heart in, though, is that more than ever, there are signs that he does not represent the entire country, or even close to it. Immediately after Trump made his announcement, three states - New York, California, and Washington - decided to make a pact together to continue complying with the Paris Accord. Add to that a whole score of cities across the nation that also are defying Trump on his climate change agenda - not to mention in other areas, such as immigration - and it is definitely encouraging.

I was listening to an NPR news story very recently about the crisis of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia, where most of the northern parts of it have died in the last two years due to bleaching. One guy that they had on that story was a scientist and expert, and he was also an environmentalist with high hopes for the Paris Accord. When asked if he was worried about Trump pulling the United States out of the Paris Accord, he said that he was not. He, an Australian, had noticed that many of the states (he singled out California) were determined to go ahead and meet climate change goals on their own, regardless of what Trump had to say about things, and he also suggested that many companies are doing the same thing, developing clean technology of their own accord, because they understand what Trump clearly does not: this is the future, while coal is not. Also, he reminded everyone that Trump is blessedly temporary, and will eventually leave office, and another president would come in. More than likely, he said, the United States would eventually rejoin the Paris Accord, which actually is true. So, we cannot despair, because Trump cannot and will not be able to undo all of the positives that have been created on this issue.

The second thing that seemed encouraging was that also immediately following Trump's announcement, other countries seemed to only dig the trenches deeper and recommit to the fight against climate change. China and Europe reaffirmed their commitment to work together on this matter, and in Europe, the leaders of Germany, France, and the Netherlands made announcements denying that they will work with Trump to make some kind of a special, separate deal for the United States to remain in the Paris Accord. This makes sense, because this deal took 10 years. It is not perfect, but it is a first step - and a serious step - by almost all of the world's nations to address combating climate change. It breaks my heart that my country, the United States, has decided to leave it. However, that is their choice, even if it is clearly the wrong choice, and the rest of the world cannot, under any circumstances, encourage the United States - one of the world's biggest polluters now for many, many decades - to feel itself to be an exception to the sacrifices that other countries are making. The United States is not exempt from what will happen to the world with climate change, and no separate deal should be made to accommodate this delusion. This is the time to stand up to a man, a so called leader, like Trump, rather than appeasing his idiocy and his delusions of exceptionalism, for himself and for his country.





California, New York, Washington unite to back climate pact by Kathleen Ronayne, Associated Press, June 2, 2017:





Why Nicaragua and Syria didn’t join the Paris climate acc by Adam Taylor, May 31, 2017:

Thursday, June 1, 2017

Roger Waters Unafraid of Controversy Expressing His Anti-Trump Views

It's a familiar story, right?

An artist produces something remarkable, that offers something unique, a different perspective. Some people are attracted to it, and there begins to be a buzz about them. Then, other people grow attracted, but a good deal of the new people are attracted to the excitement, to the buzz surrounding the artist, rather than the art itself, and hat it implies. This disconnect starts to grow, until it grows all out of proportion. Before long, all that the art is about is basically lost in a sea of hype, and whatever the original meaning was is lost.

Perhaps this happens with all arts, although it seems particularly prominent with music, probably because music is able to move people in a more immediate and emotional way then most, if not all, of the other arts (at least this is true for most people).

And so, it no longer really comes as a surprise. Truth be told, it was not that much of a surprise to begin with, anyway. I remember seeing the new wave of alternative musicians merge in the early nineties, particularly the "Seattle scene."

While I was not naive to the fact that many people were attracted to bands like Nirvana, Pearl Jam, and Soundgarden for their heavy music, and how they became the "cool" bands that were "in" and frequently played on MTV, I admit that it came as a surprise to me that so many people were completely oblivious to what they were trying to say. Each of these bands was against the traditional machismo and sexism of heavy metal bands. Perry Farrell, himself not a Seattle product, but definitely of the same mindset as those bands, came up with the idea of Lollapalooza, but felt so strongly about what it was supposed to represent and, perhaps more tellingly, what it was not supposed to represent, that he resigned when Metallica was included in the 1996 lineup. He felt that their excessively macho, tough guy image was not in keeping with the spirit behind Lollapalooza.

It seemed ridiculous to me that people would get so worked up and upset when Pearl Jam expressed their political viewpoints in Denver and then especially in Uniondale, a concert that I attended, and reviewed many years after the fact here on "The Charbor Chronicles." After all, they have always, always been a political band, from the first. Vedder appeared with a self-made coathanger t-shirt on SNL in '92, and then, at the end of the performance, he turned his back towards the camera and lowered his jacket,to reveal a "No Bush '92" statement that he had printed out on the back of his t-shirt. They had expressed political viewpoints on numerous other occasions, too. Why the sudden shock?

And so it seems equally absurd that now, Roger Waters fans are acting shocked and angry that the notoriously political singer is expressing his anti-Trump views in a very clear, unambiguous way. Supposedly, some fans left immediately in protest, and some even stuck their middle fingers up towards the stage, and towards Waters.

But here's the thing: Waters has never made any bones about not only his political views, but also in his desire to express them, as well!

When I saw Waters years ago during "The Wall" tour in 2010, people cheered wildly during the song "Mother" when he asked the question in the lyrics, "Mother should I trust the government?" and there, written on the wall, were the words, "Hell No!"

That they could agree with, as Americans are notoriously skeptical of government, to the point that it goes to unhealthy extremes where they seem to think that anything is better, including corporations who now largely rule the country.

So clearly, they had no problem with that. What many people get offended by are views that do not expressly agree with their own political viewpoints. Much like those who walked out during the Pearl Jam concert in Denver in 2003, or those who also walked out and/or booed at the Nassau Coliseum concert that I attended about one month after that, the people who walked out or reacted angrily when Waters clearly expressed his anti-Trump stance are being a bit disingenuous. Waters has always been a political artist, and expressing his views is part of his act. Always has been, and yes, it always will be. If they turn a blind eye to that, then that's on them, and not on Waters, because they cannot fairly say that they were not warned. At best, they can say that they were not paying attention.

Frankly, that would be about the size of it. Those are surface fans, who just like the music, and want to pretend that it's just the music, and nothing else, that they like about Waters and/or Pink Floyd. but since it is art, it expresses far more than just catchy music. It says something. Waters is trying to express his views, and originally, "The Wall" album was all about a figurative, but very real, wall that existed between artist and audience, as well as the artificially constructed walls that society places in between people, to keep everyone separate, and which fosters distrust and, yes, hatred.

How could you not expect Waters to use the whole obsession with a literal wall being built between the American and Mexican border, when this idea generated such controversy and sparked such outrage and hatred to begin with?

Let me guess: it's okay when Waters roots for the wall of communism in Berlin to fall back during the days of the Cold War, but now that he is targeting Trump's wall against Mexican immigration, he should just keep his mouth shut?

This is ridiculous, and completely against the spirit of free speech! It seems that increasingly, Americans feel that free speech implies the freedom of speech that they agree with, and are showing more and more vehemence and intolerance to speech that they do not agree with.

A sad sign of the times. 



Pink Floyd's Roger Waters begins tour in Kansas City with an all-out attack on Donald Trump  By Walter Einenkel   Tuesday May 30, 2017






ROGER WATERS BRINGS POWERFUL ANTI-TRUMP MESSAGE ON NEW TOUR, OFFENDING SOME FANS BY ROB COTTON, MAY 27, 2017: